Re: ANN: "Interacting with CORBA" article

• To: info-dylan@ai.mit.edu
• Subject: Re: ANN: "Interacting with CORBA" article
• From: Scott Ribe <sribe@miqs.com>
• Date: Tue, 28 Dec 1999 10:30:05 -0500 (EST)
• References: <zttgOD=0l=XM85IRzhMCr4EWEBLo@4ax.com> <slrn862hmg.dl.fp@rose.fpx.de> <QwtiOMx20lzraGOjAw8RqmMMDbkb@4ax.com> <slrn86ftfo.hb.fp@rose.fpx.de>
• Xref: grapevine.lcs.mit.edu comp.lang.dylan:11368 comp.object.corba:33944

Frank Pilhofer wrote:
> 
>  Now if you could be persuaded to accept scripting languages, in the above
> definition, to be of the same completeness as Dylan, we can stop kicking
> around and continue in our quest to use CORBA everywhere, using the de-
> veloper's language of choice.

Except that they are NOT as complete, well-structured, or
general-purpose as Dylan. And that statement is a LONG way from
dismissing them as "little useless toys", which is not Jason's phrase
but your blatant twisting of his position. They certainly have many good
uses, but to develop a "full-scale project" in, for a particularly bad
example, Perl, is just plain stupid.

• ANN: "Interacting with CORBA" article
• From: jason@fun-o.com
• Re: ANN: "Interacting with CORBA" article
• From: fp@informatik.uni-frankfurt.de (Frank Pilhofer)
• Re: ANN: "Interacting with CORBA" article
• From: Jason Trenouth <jason@harlequin.com>
• Re: ANN: "Interacting with CORBA" article
• From: fp@informatik.uni-frankfurt.de (Frank Pilhofer)

• Prev: Re: Is this the right behavior?
• Next: <!-- To use a different cobrand, make sure you have a template for it in /parts/cobrand/ -->
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread