[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: [FD] [BUG] nested for functions weird?



In article <Pine.GSO.3.96.1000307165736.10480B-
100000@tardis.tardis.ed.ac.uk>,
  Hugh Greene <q@tardis.ed.ac.uk> wrote:
> I'll have to wait till I get home tonight to test this, but maybe it's
> just that "stdout" isn't getting flushed, so the last line doesn't get
> printed?  I can't remember offhand how to flush the output stream but
> there *is* a function for it, and adding an extra "\n" might suffice:
>
Dear all, thank you for your posts and emails.  Jonathan Bachrach
(president, Functional Objects), suggested this code snippet (which
does the trick)

finally // for the outer for loop
  force-output(*standard-output*);
end for;

Sincerely,
Douglas M. Auclair


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.



References: