[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: 'indefinite' element types



Dustin Voss d_voss@uswest.net on  2000-07-15 01:15 wrote:

> There is nothing stopping you from defining a subclass of <collection>
> whose element type is indefinite <= <mytzlplck>, so long as <object> is
> somewhere in its ancestry -- and <object> is in everything's ancestry.

I must be missing something.  What would the Dylan code be to define a such
a subclass?



Follow-Ups: References: