[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: Dylan (DYnamic LANguage) -- what's the deal?



In article <398EA28C.97F804D3@dial.pipex.com>,
jt  <gkt37@dial.pipex.com> wrote:
> Do you claim technically good = commercially successful? If so, what
> sort of technical attributes must a language/system have that ensures
> commercial viability?

It has to be difficult to interoperate with, while providing the hooks
needed for application programs via a sufficiently complex API such that
programs written for it are inherently non-portable. If this makes it
hard to replace the first implementation with an improved one that is
an acceptable cost... application and environment lock-in are the only
critical requirements.

-- 
 `-_-'   In hoc signo hack, Peter da Silva.
  'U`    "Ar rug tú barróg ar do mhactíre inniu?" 

         Disclaimer: Matthew 10:16.



Follow-Ups: References: