Re: Is Dylan a functional language?

• To: info-dylan@ai.mit.edu
• Subject: Re: Is Dylan a functional language?
• From: Chris Double <chris@double.co.nz>
• Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 14:45:02 -0400 (EDT)
• Organization: None.
• References: <3BC2532B.5030707@staffware-spokane.com> <bruce-7163B3.14560209102001@news.paradise.net.nz> <pan.2001.10.08.23.37.13.101.1138@uchicago.edu> <20011009082031.F29607@workhorse>
• Sender: unknown@DOUBLE
• User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) Emacs/20.6
• Xref: traf.lcs.mit.edu comp.lang.dylan:13722

Stefan Schmiedl <s@xss.de> writes:

> which is not the place, even a Dylan person would look for it,

Hopefully they'll look here:

http://dmoz.org/Computers/Programming/Languages/Dylan/

Judging by the number of people coming from that link to my own Dylan
site (according to the referrer logs) it's quite a popular starting
point. That and a Google search for
'Dylan+Programming+Language'. 

Chris.
-- 
http://www.double.co.nz/dylan

• Re: Is Dylan a functional language?
• From: Bruce Hoult <bruce@hoult.org>
• Re: Is Dylan a functional language?
• From: "Ben Wolfson" <wolfson@uchicago.edu>
• Re: Is Dylan a functional language?
• From: Stefan Schmiedl <s@xss.de>

• Prev: Re: GUID algorithm
• Next: Re: GUID algorithm
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread