<apply-command> ::= apply <names> to <target> <target> ::= <names> | conjecture
apply passive / deduction-rules to * apply setExtensionality to conjecture
The second version attempts to prove the current conjecture by explicit deduction using the named deduction rules. The attempt succeeds if the current conjecture matches a conclusion of a named deduction rule and the hypotheses of that deduction rule, under the matching substitution, reduce to true. For example, if LP's logical system contains the axioms
then the command apply setExtensionality to conjecture finishes the proof of the conjecture x \U x = x.setAxioms.1: e \in (x \U y) -> e \in x \/ e \in y setExtensionality.1: when \A e (e \in s1 <=> e \in s2) yield s1 = s2