[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: <text-field>, size, GDI context...
In article <wkbt7shjzj.fsf@double.co.nz>, Chris Double
<chris@double.co.nz> wrote:
> Note to Functional Objects, is there any consideration to changing some
> of these protocols for the win32-* classes to be open? Is there much
> of a performance/size impact?
I would have thought that constructing GUIs is the one place where it is
unassailable that added flexibility is well worth a little dispatch
overhead. GUIs are at the same time so common, so fluid in their
specifications, such a pain to set up, and so performance non-critical
that they were one of the first big success stories of OO languages back
in the days when a 1 MIPS CPU was state of the art.
-- Bruce
Follow-Ups:
References:
- <text-field>, size, GDI context...
- From: Scott Ribe <sribe@miqs.com>
- Re: <text-field>, size, GDI context...
- From: Chris Double <chris@double.co.nz>
- Re: <text-field>, size, GDI context...
- From: Scott Ribe <sribe@miqs.com>
- Re: <text-field>, size, GDI context...
- From: Chris Double <chris@double.co.nz>
- Re: <text-field>, size, GDI context...
- From: Scott Ribe <sribe@miqs.com>
- Re: <text-field>, size, GDI context...
- From: Chris Double <chris@double.co.nz>