[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: MI: why?
Marcel Weiher <marcel@cs.tu-berlin.de> wrote:
> "Richard MacDonald" <macdonaldrj@worldnet.att.net> writes:
>
> The GenVoca/Predator project(s) at U-Texas have some interesting
> work on this. As you've shown here, collection classes are
> actually defined by orthogonal feature vectors, leading to
> a potential number of classes that is exponential in the
> number of different features (the actual number is lower
> because some combinations don't make sense).
>
> They call this the library scaling problem. Anyway, the
> approach they use is a form of code generation, but not
> as ad-hoc as code-gen usually tends to be.
>
> http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/schwartz/
In a functional setting, Simon Peyton-Jones paper "Bulk Types with
Class" is good reading, too:
http://www.research.microsoft.com/Users/simonpj/Papers/collections.ps.gz
Neel
Follow-Ups:
- Re: MI: why?
- From: hs@inferno.nirvananet (Hartmann Schaffer)
References:
- Re: MI: why?
- From: carlg@world.std.com (Carl E Gundel)
- Re: MI: why?
- From: "Lawrence G. Mayka" <mayka@lucent.com>
- Re: MI: why?
- From: "James A. Robertson" <jarober@home.com>
- Re: MI: why?
- From: "Richard MacDonald" <macdonaldrj@worldnet.att.net>