Re: precedence of | and &

• To: info-dylan@ai.mit.edu
• Subject: Re: precedence of | and &
• From: Chris Double <chris@double.co.nz>
• Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 05:00:01 -0500 (EST)
• Organization: None.
• References: <brucehoult-1503001808330001@bruce.bgh>
• Sender: Chris.Double@DOUBLEC
• User-Agent: Gnus/5.070099 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.99) Emacs/20.4
• Xref: traf.lcs.mit.edu comp.lang.dylan:11644

brucehoult@pobox.com (Bruce Hoult) writes:

> The folly of relying on precedence in complicated expressions aside,
> does anyone else think that it would really be better if | had lower
> precedence than &, as in practicaly every other language in common
> use?

What are the advantages of & having lower precedence than |? What are
the disadvantages of them both being the same precedence?

Chris.
-- 
http://www.double.co.nz/dylan

• Re: precedence of | and &
• From: brucehoult@pobox.com (Bruce Hoult)

• precedence of | and &
• From: brucehoult@pobox.com (Bruce Hoult)

• Prev: Destructors
• Next: Re: precedence of | and &
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread