AW: Thanks for your reply Bruce

• To: info-dylan@ai.mit.edu
• Subject: AW: Thanks for your reply Bruce
• From: "Schlichte, Marc, PASSO-TS, MThiel" <Marc.Schlichte@PASSO.DE>
• Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 09:00:26 +0200
• Sender: owner-info-dylan@ai.mit.edu

> Rob Myers <robm@tdv.com> wrote:
> > As other posters have already pointed out, C++ interoperability is a
> real
> > minefiled for any language. Different C++ compilers, ANSI or not, cannot
> > talk to each other without an object model shim. The name mangling and
> > vTables are different.
> 
	[Schlichte, Marc]  What about Dylan in this respect?
	Can libraries built by different Dylan compilers for one machine/OS
talk to each 
	other seamlessly? Is there a Dylan ABI for some plattforms which
defines the object-layout,
	method-dispatch (elaborated v-tables) and name-mangling etc. to beat
C++
	in this field?

	marc

• Re: AW: Thanks for your reply Bruce
• From: brucehoult@pobox.com (Bruce Hoult)
• Re: AW: Thanks for your reply Bruce
• From: Andreas Bogk <andreas@andreas.org>

• Prev: Re: AW: Thanks for your reply Bruce
• Next: Re: C++ integration, again. I found another language besides Eiffel
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread