Re: Gwydion and HD

• To: info-dylan@ai.mit.edu
• Subject: Re: Gwydion and HD
• From: brucehoult@pobox.com (Bruce Hoult)
• Date: Sat, 13 May 2000 04:00:03 -0400 (EDT)
• Organization: The Internet Group Ltd
• References: <227T4.1979$zI5.71662@news.uswest.net>
• Xref: traf.lcs.mit.edu comp.lang.dylan:12025

In article <227T4.1979$zI5.71662@news.uswest.net>, "Shawn"
<shawn@anarchy-arts.com> wrote:

>     Earlier it was stated that the two implementations of the compilers were
> pursuing separate paths, and may not be compatible. Is it possible to get
> both camps working towards a standardized release for multiple platforms ?

The intentions of the Gwydion group are certainly to stay compatable with
Functional Objects and with the Dylan standard (of course, whatever GD and
FO both do essentially *is* the standard).

Mostly what this requires is for both groups to tell each other what
they're doing that doesn't correspond to the DRM ... and some time for the
other implementation to catch up.

-- Bruce

• Re: Gwydion and HD
• From: Roman Budzianowski <rbudzian@us.oracle.com>

• Gwydion and HD
• From: "Shawn" <shawn@anarchy-arts.com>

• Prev: Re: C functions with variable parm lists
• Next: Gwydion and HD
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread