Re: good bang for buck machines?

To: info-dylan@ai.mit.edu
Subject: Re: good bang for buck machines?
From: "Scott McKay" <swm@mediaone.net>
Date: Sun, 21 May 2000 10:45:01 -0400 (EDT)
Organization: Road Runner
References: <brucehoult-2105000931100001@bruce.bgh> <brucehoult-2105001044590001@bruce.bgh>
Xref: traf.lcs.mit.edu comp.lang.dylan:12044

I have a AMD K6-2 running at 450mHz, and it seems to be a bit
zippier than the 500 mHz P-III running on my Vaio.  But I also spent
a bit more money on a faster backplane and a faster disk.

I don't know how much that tells you, since the two machines have
pretty different architectures.

Bruce Hoult wrote in message ...
>In article <brucehoult-2105000931100001@bruce.bgh>, brucehoult@pobox.com
>(Bruce Hoult) wrote:
>
>> So, if anyone out there is using d2c on a PIII or Athlon then I'd be
>> really really interested in hearing from you about what your machine
>> configuration is and how long it takes for, say, a "cd src/d2c;make
>> clean;time make" and/or the same thing in the src directory itself (which
>> runs all the tests, builds mindy and the demos etc).
>
>To get things started, on my current PPro200, 160 MB RAM, Redhat 5.2, d2c
2.3.3:
>
>src/d2c: make clean; time make
>3492.68user 161.09system 1:03:58elapsed 95%CPU
>
>-- Bruce

References:

good bang for buck machines?

From: brucehoult@pobox.com (Bruce Hoult)

Re: good bang for buck machines?

From: brucehoult@pobox.com (Bruce Hoult)