Re: A few questions about Dylan.

• To: info-dylan@ai.mit.edu
• Subject: Re: A few questions about Dylan.
• From: Chris Double <chris@double.co.nz>
• Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 22:15:02 -0400 (EDT)
• Organization: None.
• References: <394b62d9.583151734@nntp.interaccess.com> <bruce-5BB76B.13064717062000@news.akl.ihug.co.nz>
• Sender: unknown@DOUBLE
• User-Agent: Gnus/5.070099 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.99) Emacs/20.6
• Xref: traf.lcs.mit.edu comp.lang.dylan:12202

Bruce Hoult <bruce@hoult.org> writes:

> The commercial "Functional Developer" product imposes no
> restrictions of distribution of binaries.

There is one little 'restriction' but it's not exactly onerous. If you
supply the FD runtime DLL's without using the FD installer for them
you need to present the FD license agreement for the runtime files
during installation and give the user the opportunity to accept or
decline it. The standard FD runtime installer does this automatically
so I just distribute that or tell people where to download it.

Chris.
-- 
http://www.double.co.nz/dylan

• A few questions about Dylan.
• From: olczyk@interaccess.com (Thaddeus L. Olczyk)
• Re: A few questions about Dylan.
• From: Bruce Hoult <bruce@hoult.org>

• Prev: Re: A few questions about Dylan.
• Next: Re: A few questions about Dylan.
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread