Keith Playford keith.playford@pobox.com on 2000-09-20 20:16 wrote: > Maybe I can see > where you're coming from, but even if remove-key! weren't required > to work destructively, doing remove-key! on a vector index would > still leave the key present (albeit with a different value) for every > case but the last index. Which is an odd contract! Ah. In looking for consistency, I was foolish. Thanks.