Re: Evidence that Functional Objects is real?

• To: <info-dylan@ai.mit.edu>
• Subject: Re: Evidence that Functional Objects is real?
• From: Scott Ribe <scott_ribe@killerbytes.com>
• Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2000 09:34:33 -0700
• In-Reply-To: <8tugh2$8ks$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
• References: <8tugh2$8ks$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
• Sender: owner-info-dylan@ai.mit.edu

Bruce, Rob, Les:

While I agree with your excellent posts, I have to wonder if you are
wasting your time. It looks like to me the poster did not just use a
personal email account to avoid having this discussion going to his
company email, but rather actively forged the return address. That makes
me wonder if we aren't just dealing with a troll?

Also, mixed in with legitimate questions about Dylan, the state of Fun-O,
and availability of programmers were a few comments that struck me as
definitely derogatory and unprofessional. I think somebody was just
trying to "tweak" us.


Scott Ribe
scott_ribe@killerbytes.com
http://www.killerbytes.com/
(303) 665-7007 voice

• Re: Evidence that Functional Objects is real?
• From: kachinadtm@my-deja.com

• Prev: Re: Evidence that Functional Objects is real?
• Next: Re: Evidence that Functional Objects is real?
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread