[Prev][Index][Thread]
Re: Question about CLisp, Dylan, Haskell, Ocaml
-
To: info-dylan@ai.mit.edu
-
Subject: Re: Question about CLisp, Dylan, Haskell, Ocaml
-
From: Helmut Enck-Radana <parher@my-deja.com>
-
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 12:45:02 -0500 (EST)
-
Organization: Deja.com
-
References: <92svh8$ohn$1@cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu> <92u0o9$6af$1@cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu>
-
Xref: traf.lcs.mit.edu comp.lang.dylan:12940
In article <92u0o9$6af$1@cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu>,
"Daniel C. Wang" <danwang+news@cs.princeton.edu> wrote:
> Rolf Wester <rolf.wester@t-online.de> writes:
> > First
> > I considered CLisp but also found some other interesting languages
such
> > as Dylan, Haskell and Ocaml. Is there someone who can tell me
> > about the differences of these languages, what kind of applications
this
> > languages are best suited for and the how easy it is to combine code
> > with C-code.
>
> I think, most people familiar with all the languages, would say OCaml
is
> most likely what you want. Though Dylan, may be okay too, but I think
OCaml
> is a more mature and lean development environment. Once SML/NJ gets a
better
> FFI, I'd probably recomended it over OCaml.. but I have my biases.
>
> > I know that this is much a question of taste. To repeat I don't
want to
> > begin a language war but
> > would be thankful for objective assesments.
>
> I don't think this is an issue of taste, objectively the ML/family of
> languages are probably best suited for your problem.
>
>
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/