> I'm sure there are faster solutions. I just adapted the first solution > that I found on the web. Yours is still the fastest I've received. > > Was the SICP algorithm meant to be fast? It may have just been meant to > be concise. Perhaps, and concise it is ... I'm also looking for something faster that SICP, so thanks for your help on this. Sincerely, Doug Auclair Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/