Re: Newbie question: Dylan and OOP?

• To: "Scott McKay" <swm@mediaone.net>
• Subject: Re: Newbie question: Dylan and OOP?
• From: Jason Trenouth <jason@harlequin.co.uk>
• Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 09:56:38 +0000
• Cc: info-dylan@ai.mit.edu
• In-Reply-To: <G36c6.14766$t3.3367457@typhoon.ne.mediaone.net>
• References: <003101c08732$7bfd8260$8a00000a@darwin.net> <94qpb3$ntn$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <G36c6.14766$t3.3367457@typhoon.ne.mediaone.net>
• Sender: owner-info-dylan@ai.mit.edu

On Thu, 25 Jan 2001 22:30:02 -0500 (EST), "Scott McKay" <swm@mediaone.net>
wrote:

> I think it's telling that Java, e.g., cannot be implemented using it's own
> objects and abstractions from the ground up in Java, but Dylan can be.
> (For example, arithmetic and arrays can't be implemented, never
> mind extended, in Java, but are just part of the language in Dylan). 

Well, much as I hate to mention them, there are projects like the
following:

"Jalapeno" <http://www.research.ibm.com/jalapeno/>

and

"OpenJIT" <www.openjit.org>

__Jason

• Re: Newbie question: Dylan and OOP?
• From: Doug Orleans <dougo@ccs.neu.edu>
• Re: Newbie question: Dylan and OOP?
• From: "Scott McKay" <swm@mediaone.net>

• Newbie question: Dylan and OOP?
• From: "Doug Ball" <doug@postsmart.net>
• Re: Newbie question: Dylan and OOP?
• From: oodl@my-deja.com
• Re: Newbie question: Dylan and OOP?
• From: "Scott McKay" <swm@mediaone.net>

• Prev: Re: Newbie question: Dylan and OOP?
• Next: Re: Newbie question: Dylan and OOP?
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread