[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Good book on Dylan?
-
To: info-dylan@ai.mit.edu
-
Subject: Re: Good book on Dylan?
-
From: Bruce Hoult <bruce@hoult.org>
-
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001 19:00:01 -0400 (EDT)
-
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
-
Organization: ihug ( New Zealand )
-
References: <200104011818.OAA16279@life.ai.mit.edu> <CaNx6.5014$I5.6892@stones>
-
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.0 (PPC)
-
Xref: traf.lcs.mit.edu comp.lang.dylan:13195
In article <CaNx6.5014$I5.6892@stones>, "Mark Jordan"
<mark_jordan@nospam.ieee.org> wrote:
> The best way to get new users would be to participate in those
> newsgroups and casually mention that Dylan does this better,
> drop a few references to the DRM etc. Don't you think?
>
> Also go to places like comp.object where there's currently a
> big discussion on static vs dynamic languages. Then you could
> talk about Dylan and how it offers the best of both worlds.
> This is a great opportunity to spread the gospel, do it now! :-)
I try to do exactly that. But you've got to be low-key about it. And I
haven't done it in comp.object for maybe a couple of months.
Your implementation also needs to be *ready*, otherwise it can be
counter-productive.
With d2c, I think we still really need to get the C-FFI in place before
the big push. We've got some important things such as class- and
each-subclass- slots and limited collections in place recently, so it's
getting pretty close. More speed in the compiler and smaller
executables would be the icing, but I think they're not totally
necessary at the start.
-- Bruce
Follow-Ups:
References: