Re: Long names are doom ?

To: info-dylan@ai.mit.edu
Subject: Re: Long names are doom ?
From: "Peter Pichler" <pichlo3@pobox.sk>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 17:45:02 -0400 (EDT)
Organization: Virgin Net Usenet Service
References: <3B0DBCAB.E3F06372@my-deja.net> <VFlP6.293598$166.6216527@news1.rdc1.bc.home.com> <xSqP6.75$XQ6.3413@news.get2net.dk> <mair_fheal-2505012032520001@c8.ppp.tsoft.com> <arGP6.299770$166.6375206@news1.rdc1.bc.home.com> <3b24b51f.cfe42@nancy.pacific.net.au>
Xref: traf.lcs.mit.edu comp.lang.c:489811 comp.lang.apl:18708 comp.lang.dylan:13340 comp.lang.clos:5194 comp.lang.smalltalk:114695

Ken Travers wrote in message <3b24b51f.cfe42@nancy.pacific.net.au>...
>
>I'm not normally one to complain, but I have to say this thread has become
>very difficult to read (from an APL viewpoint) because most of the items DO
>NOT RELATE TO APL.
>
>I have limited time (and I read slowly).  Does anyone else share my
concern?

Yes. Here on comp.lang.c.

--
Peter Pichler (Increment my "From:" address if your email bounces.)
This message is not solicitation for contact via email or phone.

References:

Re: Long names are doom ?

From: mair_fheal@www.yahoo.akadns.net (morgan mair fheal)

Re: Long names are doom ?

From: "Steve Wart" <swart@deadspam.com>

Re: Long names are doom ?

From: "Ken Travers" <ktravers@zeta.org.au>