Re: Are there any .NET possibilities/implications for Dylan/Functional Developer?

• To: "Gary Stephenson" <garys@ihug.com.au>
• Subject: Re: Are there any .NET possibilities/implications for Dylan/Functional Developer?
• From: Jason Trenouth <jason.trenouth@globalgraphics.com>
• Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 09:34:58 +0100
• Cc: info-dylan@ai.mit.edu
• In-Reply-To: <9gn0f0$u2s$1@bugstomper.ihug.com.au>
• References: <ff18f689.0106181622.1dbdc6f1@posting.google.com> <9gn0f0$u2s$1@bugstomper.ihug.com.au>
• Sender: owner-info-dylan@ai.mit.edu

On Tue, 19 Jun 2001 04:00:02 -0400 (EDT), "Gary Stephenson"
<garys@ihug.com.au> wrote:

> Hi Levi,
> 
> I'm in much the same boat as you.  Somebody mentioned something here about
> .NET recently and I posted saying that if FO were to announce a .NET
> strategy I would fork out and buy it immediately.
> 
> Nobody replied :-(  - whatever that might mean.

I guess the Fun'O folks wanted to see how much interest there was. One
Fun'Dev license won't pay for a port to .NET on its own.

__Jason

• Re: Are there any .NET possibilities/implications for Dylan/Functional Developer?
• From: shepherdofchaos@cs.com (Levi Conley)
• Re: Are there any .NET possibilities/implications for Dylan/Functional Developer?
• From: "Michael T. Richter" <mtr@ottawa.com>

• Are there any .NET possibilities/implications for Dylan/Functional Developer?
• From: shepherdofchaos@cs.com (Levi Conley)
• Re: Are there any .NET possibilities/implications for Dylan/Functional Developer?
• From: "Gary Stephenson" <garys@ihug.com.au>

• Prev: Re: Are there any .NET possibilities/implications for Dylan/Functional Developer?
• Next: Re: Are there any .NET possibilities/implications for Dylan/Functional Developer?
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread