Re: Are there any .NET possibilities/implications for Dylan/Functional Developer?

• To: Jaime Vargas <jev@mac.com>, <info-dylan@ai.mit.edu>
• Subject: Re: Are there any .NET possibilities/implications for Dylan/Functional Developer?
• From: Raffael Cavallaro <raffael@mediaone.net>
• Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2001 16:42:45 -0400
• In-Reply-To: <8898d7bd.0107020828.5f51633d@posting.google.com>
• Sender: owner-info-dylan@ai.mit.edu
• User-Agent: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.02.2022

On 7/2/01 12:30 PM, Jaime Vargas, (jev@mac.com), wrote:

> I will like to see a Mac OS X version too, and may be an IDE that
> looks like the original Apple Dylan Technology Release.

Works like the Apple Dylan TR would be better than looks like - Both Apple
Dylan and Harlequin/Fun-O have incremental compilers, which, IMHO, are what
makes dynamic languages worth while.

Raf
-- 

Raffael Cavallaro, Ph.D.
raffael@mediaone.net

• Re: Are there any .NET possibilities/implications for Dylan/Functional Developer?
• From: jev@mac.com (Jaime Vargas)

• Prev: Re: Are there any .NET possibilities/implications for Dylan/Functional Developer?
• Next: Re: Are there any .NET possibilities/implications for Dylan/Functional Developer?
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread