Re: FunDev -> OCX?

• To: info-dylan@ai.mit.edu
• Subject: Re: FunDev -> OCX?
• From: Chris Double <chris@double.co.nz>
• Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 19:45:02 -0400 (EDT)
• Organization: None.
• References: <5b2745d1.0109141132.a38f312@posting.google.com> <wkelp6azal.fsf@double.co.nz> <5b2745d1.0109200919.36326509@posting.google.com> <5b2745d1.0110160746.3047ef2f@posting.google.com>
• Sender: unknown@DOUBLE
• User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) Emacs/20.6
• Xref: traf.lcs.mit.edu comp.lang.dylan:13744

under_dog@volcanomail.com (UnderDog) writes:

> Has anyone found a solution to this? I'd like to use FunDev on some
> projects, but if it can't talk to my existing junky VB components,
> then it's really a tough sell. 

When running the generated OCX file under Visual Basic I get an error
about the class not being registered - even though it is.

When running it under Microsoft Visual C++ I get an assertion inside
some of the MFC OLE libraries. If I ignore the assertion then the
application runs fine and the OCX works. It is probably this assertion
that trips up VB.

The trick will be to find out why that assertion is being triggered
and fix the problem with the Functional Developer OLE libraries (if it
lies within there).

If I get time, and Fun-O or yourself haven't responded that it's
already resolved, I'll try and look into it.

Chris.
-- 
http://www.double.co.nz/dylan

• Re: FunDev -> OCX?
• From: under_dog@volcanomail.com (UnderDog)

• FunDev -> OCX?
• From: under_dog@volcanomail.com (UnderDog)
• Re: FunDev -> OCX?
• From: Chris Double <chris@double.co.nz>
• Re: FunDev -> OCX?
• From: under_dog@volcanomail.com (UnderDog)
• Re: FunDev -> OCX?
• From: under_dog@volcanomail.com (UnderDog)

• Prev: Re: Distributed objects vs. generic functions and multi-methods
• Next: Re: Distributed objects vs. generic functions and multi-methods
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread