Re: function signature type checking

• To: info-dylan@ai.mit.edu
• Subject: Re: function signature type checking
• From: Andreas Bogk <andreas@andreas.org>
• Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 20:30:02 -0500 (EST)
• References: <uy9kto2dr.fsf@telus.net> <bruce-BFF274.09083927112001@news.paradise.net.nz>
• Sender: andreas@teonanacatl.andreas.org
• User-Agent: Gnus/5.0806 (Gnus v5.8.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Civil Service)
• Xref: traf.lcs.mit.edu comp.lang.dylan:13792

Bruce Hoult <bruce@hoult.org> writes:

> This has long seemed to me to be one of the more important language 
> extensions needed.

Yes, I think we've learned enough to improve Dylan by now.  The
question is whether we have the manpower for a Dylan 2.0, at the
moment IŽd have my doubts.

Andreas

-- 
"In my eyes it is never a crime to steal knowledge. It is a good
theft. The pirate of knowledge is a good pirate."
                                                       (Michel Serres)

• Re: function signature type checking
• From: Bruce Hoult <bruce@hoult.org>

• function signature type checking
• From: Ray Blaak <blaak@telus.net>
• Re: function signature type checking
• From: Bruce Hoult <bruce@hoult.org>

• Prev: Re: function signature type checking
• Next: Re: function signature type checking
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread