Re: Fun-O Basic Edition Compiler

• To: info-dylan@ai.mit.edu
• Subject: Re: Fun-O Basic Edition Compiler
• From: "Scott McKay" <swm@mediaone.net>
• Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2001 20:00:02 -0500 (EST)
• Organization: ATT Broadband
• References: <200112211641.LAA28762@life.ai.mit.edu> <3C276FAF.F89966B9@mediaone.net> <3C28F100.9478041B@mediaone.net>
• Xref: traf.lcs.mit.edu comp.lang.dylan:13861

"Carl Gay" <carlgay@mediaone.net> wrote in message
3C28F100.9478041B@mediaone.net">news:3C28F100.9478041B@mediaone.net...
> Carl Gay wrote:
> >
> > I get 2.8x speedup in production mode over development mode.
> > Unfortunately, the lispworks version with no type declarations
> > runs 1.6x faster than that.
>
> Even more unfortunately, a java version runs 1.6x faster than
> the Lispworks version and 2.5x faster than FunDev.
>
> Anyone want to do the comparison on Gwydion?

Could you post the exact code you used for Dylan, Lisp, and Java?
You might not be comparing apples to apples...

• Re: Fun-O Basic Edition Compiler
• From: Carl Gay <carlgay@mediaone.net>

• Re: Fun-O Basic Edition Compiler
• From: Carl Gay <carlgay@mediaone.net>
• Re: Fun-O Basic Edition Compiler
• From: Carl Gay <carlgay@mediaone.net>

• Prev: Re: Fun-O Basic Edition Compiler
• Next: Re: Fun-O Basic Edition Compiler
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread