
This graph illustrates the assessment of civil equity criteria in society. Categories are both government and civil society asses, only government assesses, or neither.


this chart shows opportunities by either the government or civil society to have created a system that provides countries with basic sanitation and drinking water needs. It shows across many different countries who was or was not responsible for the system being in place. Either by the government to civil society.


This is a series of graphs depicting the opportunities that exist for more involvement of civil society in assessing the application of equity criteria.


The heading of the chart is, "Opportunities exist for more involvement of civil society in assessing the application of equality criteria." Th graph shows the need of drinking water, sanitation and nutrition of countries. It also talks about how the Government is working in this matter.


The figure presented is titled Opportunities exist for more involvement of civil society in assessing the application of equity criteria (figure 5.7).


This is a graph of the opportunities that exist for more involvement of civil society in assessing the application of equity criteria. Drinking water is greater than sanitation in the first two data rows, while the opposite is true in the last data row.


It is a bar graph that shows the opportunities for civil society and government to improve sanitation and drinking water. There are more countries (?) that do not do either.


The image on the left hand side is describing in column charts the opportunities for countries to work with civil society in bringing sanitation and drinking water to the country. From the data collected it appears that a number of countries dont feel like the private and public can come together to resolve these issues.


This is a graph that shows the effectiveness of regular evaluation of the performance of civil society organizations. This shows the effectiveness of evaluation of these organizations by the government.


Opportunities exist for more involvement of civil society in assessing the application of equity criteria Left side bar is number of countries Do government and civil society organizations periodically assess and analyze whether equity set by government have been applied in funding?


This is a chart of responses to the statement "opportunities exist for more involvement in civil society in assessing the application of equity criteria".


The graph measures whether the government and civil societies keep an accurate measure to ensure that opportunities are equal for all in relation to sanitation and drinking water. From the graph, it indicates that a large portion state that they in fact don't.


This handmade chart shows the use of civil society organizations are important for improving the quality of life for citizens in the targeted society


The chart describes people's impression of whether the equity criteria supplied by the government has been met or not. The two criteria are: sanitation and drinking-water. The majority of people feel that the criteria has not been met and the smallest category is people who feel that both the government and civil society have reached the criteria.

