The chart tracks corporate fundraising related to Proposition 37, which would require labels
for genetically modified foods. Companies fighting the proposal raised over six times as many
funds as companies that support it. The companies opposed to the proposal are all large corporations
that would be likely to engage in selling genetically modified food (if they don't already
do so); the companies in favor are smaller and sell organic or natural products.
THis picture shows the preparation of both sides of the politcal spectrum preparing for the
pass or fail of prop 37; the proposition to label all GMO foods. $6.4 million dollars was
raised to support the proposal.
seeds of contention. companies on both sides of the debate are raising money ahead of the
vote on proposition 37 which would require labels for genetically modified food. Basically
monsanto and the biggest producers oppose this motion whereas smaller responsible companies
are proponents
A graph comparing and contrasting Proposition 37 which would require companies to put labels
on genetically modified foods. It shows what companies are for the proposition and what companies
are against as well as the amount of money they've raised.
This is a graph that shows the reactions and extent to which the proposition 37, which deals
with having food companies label all genetically modified foods.
There are companies that are opponents and proponents to do something. They are a list of
restaurants and other food companieswith dollar amounts like 1,3, and five dollars
This is a series of graphs and charts depicting that companies on both side of the debate
are raising money ahead of the vote on Proposition 37 requiring labels for genetically modified
foods.
This image shows seeds of contention which include companies on both sides of the debate that
are raising money ahead of the vote on Proposition 37, which would require labels for genetically
modified foods. A total of 40.9 million dollars were spent to fight the labels, the highest
payer being Monsanto, followed by the next top two of Dupont and Pepsico. Only a mere 6.4
million dollars were spent in support of the label, including the support of companies like
Nature's Path Foods, and Clif Bar.
This chart describes seeds of contention. Specifically, companies on both sides of the debate
are raising money ahead of the vote on proposition 37, which would require labels.
Both those for and against Proposition 37 (labeling for genetically modified foods) are raising
money ahead of the upcoming vote. Opponents, including Monsanto, Dupoint, and Pepsico have
raised $40.9 million, while supporters have raised $6.4 million.
The figure presented is titled Seeds of contention. The figure is a representation of companies
wanting to make products labeled for Genetically modified ingredients.
This graph shows companies on both sides of the debate are raising money ahead of the vote
on proposition 37 which would require labels for genetically modified food. Funds opposing
the proposition total 40.9 million and supporting the proposition just 6.4 million.
The image depicts sums of monies being raised by companies on both sides of the debate, ahead
of proposition 37, which would require labels for genetically modified foods. Funds raised
to support the proposal, 6.4 million, were eclipsed by funds raised to fight the proposal,
40.9 million.
This chart describes seeds of contention. Specifically, companies on both sides of the debate
are raising money ahead of the vote on proposition 37, which is about genetic modified food.
Money raised by companies opposed to Proposition 37 vastly exceeds the money raised by companies
supporting the proposition by almost $35 million. The largest contributor Monsanto has contributed
over $7 million to oppose Prop 37.
