[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

RE: Functional Objects Site



>But Dylan isn't just functional, it has OODLs of other 
>features. And "functional" isn't exactly flavour of the 
>month with businesses.  "Functional Developer" is a 
>strong name, I just don't believe that it's a strong
>selling one. Object would be stronger (COM stronger 
>still. :-( ).

Your problem is that you know 'functional' is a computer
science term.  Most purchasers of the product won't know
that.  They'll think of 'functional' as a business term,
which is the perfect positioning.