Re: Functional Developer as a product name

• To: ashley@yakeley.org (Ashley Yakeley)
• Subject: Re: Functional Developer as a product name
• From: jason@fun-o.com
• Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 14:14:09 +0000
• Cc: info-dylan@ai.mit.edu
• In-Reply-To: <ashley-1911990249140001@116-a-usw.rb1.blv.nwnexus.net>
• References: <199911141602.LAA29261@life.ai.mit.edu> <382F1A76.8536648F@openscript.com> <ashley-1911990249140001@116-a-usw.rb1.blv.nwnexus.net>
• Sender: owner-info-dylan@ai.mit.edu

On Fri, 19 Nov 1999 05:45:08 -0500 (EST), ashley@yakeley.org (Ashley Yakeley)
wrote:

> In article <382F1A76.8536648F@openscript.com>, James Dominy
> <jdominy@openscript.com> wrote:
> 
> > Actually, I have always thought Dylan was a pretty cool name for a
> > language and it is a shame you can't use it due to restrictions 
> > from Apple's trademark.
> 
> Maybe we need to come up with a new name for the language.

How about "elan" for "ecommerce" etc? :-j Unfortunately it looks like its been
used for a PL already back in '74: http://os.inf.tu-dresden.de/L4/l3elan.html

__Jason

• Re: Functional Developer as a product name
• From: James Dominy <jdominy@openscript.com>
• Re: Functional Developer as a product name
• From: ashley@yakeley.org (Ashley Yakeley)

• Prev: --Spring Break--
• Next: Re: Simple Reader Macros for Dylan
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread