RE: FD 2.0 is quite a tool! --long post

• To: info-dylan@ai.mit.edu
• Subject: RE: FD 2.0 is quite a tool! --long post
• From: "Whittaker, John" <john.whittaker@honeywell.com>
• Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 06:31:13 -0700
• Sender: owner-info-dylan@ai.mit.edu

I guess I like the idea of <thread-frame>?, but we're not heading down a
slippery slope toward Hungarian names are we?  (Just kidding.)

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jason Trenouth [mailto:jason@harlequin.co.uk]
>Sent: Friday, June 16, 2000 4:48 AM
>To: Rob Myers
>Cc: info-dylan@ai.mit.edu
>Subject: Re: FD 2.0 is quite a tool! --long post
>
>Well, I considered that alternative when I dreamt up the convention, but I
>prefer <thread-frame>? because I think of the type as modifier on
><thread-frame> (like false-or() itself), and so mangling the ? inside the
<>
>didn't feel right to me. 
>
>__Jason

• Prev: A few questions about Dylan.
• Next: info-dylan-digest V1 #24
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread