Re: So why compile to C++ at all?

• To: info-dylan@ai.mit.edu
• Subject: Re: So why compile to C++ at all?
• From: Chris Double <chris@double.co.nz>
• Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 16:46:23 -0400 (EDT)
• Organization: None.
• References: <3b38c24a.86356724@news.lith.com>
• Sender: unknown@DOUBLE
• User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) Emacs/20.6
• Xref: traf.lcs.mit.edu comp.lang.dylan:13433

Israel@lith.com (Israel) writes:

> Functional objects seems to compile Dylan to C.

I think you'll find that Functional Developer compiles to native
code. There is even an option on the batch compilers to produce
an assember listing.

Chris.
-- 
http://www.double.co.nz/dylan

• Re: So why compile to C++ at all?
• From: Israel@lith.com (Israel)

• So why compile to C++ at all?
• From: Israel@lith.com (Israel)

• Prev: Re: So why compile to C++ at all?
• Next: Re: Are there any .NET possibilities/implications for Dylan/Functional Developer?
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread