[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Functional Paradigm popularity and Maths (Was: XML as a transitionto s-expr)

To: address@hidden
Subject: RE: Functional Paradigm popularity and Maths (Was: XML as a transitionto s-expr)
From: Tony Kimball <address@hidden>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 02:54:44 -0600
Cc: address@hidden
References: <15393.37905.386381.913567@gargle.gargle.HOWL><Pine.LNX.4.30.0112191801550.32083-100000@cable.beta4.com>
Reply-to: address@hidden
Sender: address@hidden

Quoth Avi Bryant on Wednesday, 19 December:
: 
: But I don't think David was trying to argue that infix was
: necessarily more "natural" than prefix, since that's highly
: (human) language dependent anyway. 

But only English matters.  Have you ever seen code with Kanji keywords?

References:
- RE: Functional Paradigm popularity and Maths (Was: XML as a transition to s-expr)
  - From: Tony Kimball <alk@pobox.com>
- RE: Functional Paradigm popularity and Maths (Was: XML as a transitionto s-expr)
  - From: Avi Bryant <avi@beta4.com>

Prev by Date: RE: Functional Paradigm popularity and Maths (Was: XML as a transition to s-expr)
Next by Date: [no subject]
Previous by thread: RE: Functional Paradigm popularity and Maths (Was: XML as a transitionto s-expr)
Next by thread: RE: Functional Paradigm popularity and Maths (Was: XML as a transition to s-expr)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread