ll1-discuss@ai.mit.edu list archive, by thread.

Sorted by date, most recent thread first.

• Date Index

• The 2004 edition of The American Medical Directory cardiology, radiology, xp fxpuq pe, Marlene Jenkins
• The 2004 edition of The American Medical Directory disease, surgery, obstetrics, lxl u, Sal Hickman
• IGF2 PEN1S GROWTH SOLUTION, Olin Stover
• ADV: Attention All School Staff: Teachers, Students and Faculty Members:, Admin
• FW: LooK and feel 20 years y0unger.., Bernadine Stahl
• Stay ahead of the market with this portfolio strategy hiiqtv wdlndavdkl, Kristy Stone
• INSTANT GROWTH FORMULA!, Jamie Weston
• before the explosion buy at any price prin maamlgjlljjplv, Stefan Mendez
• didn't go to college - that's ok we'll give you a diploma, Quinton Patton
• The 2004 edition of The American Medical Directory geriatrics, anaesthesiology, ueaiamu olqjau, Bennett Cornett
• Fw: it doesn't get any better.., Tod Jordan
• we have a winning track record of investment profiles hrp, Sidney Daugherty
• Fw: shed while you sleeep.., Alejandro Ladd, 04/22/2004
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Fw: shed while you sleeep.., Drew Guerrero, 04/23/2004
  • Fw: shed while you sleeep.., Nick Pineda, 04/27/2004
  • Fw: shed while you sleeep.., Major Evans, 04/27/2004
• Fw: Sh0cking health revealati0ns.., Mitzi Choi, 04/22/2004
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Fw: Sh0cking health revealati0ns.., Abraham Booker, 04/24/2004
  • Fw: Sh0cking health revealati0ns.., Francine Burroughs, 04/25/2004
• Fw: your horoscope looks good.., Paula Thomas
• Fw: New health data just in.., Son Phipps, 04/21/2004
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Fw: New health data just in.., Mohamed Dooley, 04/26/2004
• Essential info for consistent market performance a, Frankie Miller
• hot otc flyer with 100 million sales backlog ps, Alonzo Bower
• stock is running on momentum trading kmni memsq t hx, Alec Shapiro
• Fw: Here's an all h.e.r.b.a.l s0luti0n.., Valentin Gillespie, 04/17/2004
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Fw: Here's an all h.e.r.b.a.l s0luti0n.., Shelby Sheehan, 04/19/2004
• Fw: crucial h.e.r.b.a.l c.l.i.n.i.c.., Lupe Carson
• Major recommendation poised for dramatic success t mn, Brenton Oneal
• FW: L00K and feel 20 years y0unger.., Jeremiah Mosley
• Need a Diploma? You Need a Better Degree, and we can Help!.. electroencephalography chinook shampoo showboat bart durable bloodbath creon loudspeaking deny divorcee jocular proline throwaway skyline good assay toward metal phenomenon cozy dahlia drexel episcopate glassware, Silas Sheehan
• Re: Anyone on ll1-discuss besides spammers?, p. matthew knox, 04/14/2004
  • Re: Anyone on ll1-discuss besides spammers?, Mike Newhall, 04/14/2004
• Antw: Re: Anyone on ll1-discuss besides spammers?, Olivier Lefevre
• no need to lie on your application, we can sell you a verifiable university degree, Toby Willard, 04/13/2004
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • no need to lie on your application, we can sell you a verifiable university degree, Morton Mcmillan, 04/27/2004
• We can get you a refinance quote in under 2 minutes., Gabriel Goldman
• Stock to dramatically improve your portfolio value ao wypha, Russell Waldron
• I can't believe this, Arthur Ladner
• Outstanding Amount, Dionne Koehler
• Hot pick begins a thrust to record highs ujcbv gwguudu v, Edgardo Hartley
• lack of university degree means you miss out on good jobs - we can fix that, Juliana Hodges
• Financial advice that makes a difference rmyhrfx xdqqd mrt, Carmelo Haskins
• [CfP] Deadline extension: Lisp and Scheme Workshop '04, Pascal Costanza
• you can get paid to take surveys, Erika Griffith
• Trading this one will give you that winning edge quharawo qiwaxm, Gretchen Rankin
• Notify about using the e-mail account., management
• Our capabilities make for easy investment decisions a fg smcx, Hershel Stacy
• degrees for sale, Wade Henry
• Do you get the feeling your job is going nowhere?, Lindsey Kiser
• Stock set to jump up on financial data aznhtc pqfayrx zc, Paige Naquin
• The 2004 edition of The American Medical Directory cardiology, radiology, ynrttzrswjt nxca, Darin Drew
• [no subject], anton
• Stock to climb on unprecedented run of profitability to l jito zdtljzluv, Tonya Mckay
• university degrees for sale!, Sybil Vela
• Our winning picks create extremely high satisfaction levels sxxt in dwlxmig, Harry Champion
• Earn commissions promoting other people's websites dh zxy hebkfpzeyw, Rusty Paul
• Market analysis reveals valuable stock play udukvpbr qx cw l nx, Virginia Ferguson
• This is a VERY different affiliate program, Nichole Link
• Score big gains on this pick with the click of a mouse vzb jwi p pfgcpaw, Lila Rankin
• The 2004 edition of The American Medical Directory cardiology, radiology, hegxd, Kristine Forbes
• Check out this pick before stockbrokers pile in m ezqigzg s w, Barney Maynard
• Our goal is to present winning picks to our readers m pct, Lauri Blake
• real, certifiable university degrees for sale lfcjyr, Emory Hoyt
• Strengthening short and long-term fundamentals qtcedlhpnpdmftzyh, Darrin Adams
• The 2004 edition of The American Medical Directory emergency medicine, lcegz wf, Jay Bowers
• The most undervalued stock we have ever featured snffw ukcrog qwqj, Stuart Dolan
• [CfP] 2nd Post-Java Workshop, Pascal Costanza, 03/14/2004
  • Re: [CfP] 2nd Post-Java Workshop, Daniel Weinreb, 03/15/2004
• We are seeing an onslaught of huge news for our March rocket pick vuirwe gpvo, Tory Rosenberg
• LETH busting out to all-time record highs - look at a perfect chart and score cajo qqjk, Donald Coates
• get the job you deserve qkpxb rmgd, Deloris Hendrix
• Key data indicates home run performance for this featured profile jfp joxyh hnuxc, Patricia Greer
• Our returns on profiled companies are unmatched rqxukby mggtp, Ollie Kraft
• Stock profiles based on our proven investment strategy m ypil lpneh qnrxvz, Nicolas Magee
• The 2004 edition of The American Medical Directory cardiology, radiology, furn g kxi, Adrienne Person
• Can't get the job because you don't have a university degree? Wrong!, Carole Palmer
• Have your cake and eat it too, Tonia Enriquez, 03/02/2004
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Have your cake and eat it too, Tony Mayes, 03/25/2004
• Jump in this flyer for a short term trade zgb, Olga Pearson
• [CfP] 1st European Lisp and Scheme Workshop, Pascal Costanza, 02/29/2004
  • Re: [CfP] 1st European Lisp and Scheme Workshop, Scott McKay, 03/02/2004
• available qnscx dq eqsypn fpv, Yesenia Suggs
• Turn google.com into your own automated cash machine, Jordan Goldman
• Mono meeting in Cambridge, MA (March 5 and 6), Vadim Nasardinov
• Read this to dramatically improve your stock market gains brmvlq vbnycau q, Erika Judd
• Exploding profits from the best Wall Street strategies qpryjtoc m, Betsy Knutson
• Earn profits selling other people's services, Cleo Wong
• Make a fortune with google, Debra Witt
• Memoization as alternative to mutation, Michael St. Hippolyte, 02/12/2004
  • RE: Memoization as alternative to mutation, Emery Berger, 02/12/2004
  • Re: Memoization as alternative to mutation, Mark Alexander Wotton, 02/12/2004
    • Re: Memoization as alternative to mutation, Jeremy Hylton, 02/12/2004
    • Re: Memoization as alternative to mutation, Peter van Rooijen, 02/12/2004
• No joke, you could be earning online profits in half an hour, Donald Hare
• Promote someone else's online business and cash in big, Pat Hunt
• This is real, Frieda Flint
• Aikido language, David Allison, 02/03/2004
  • Re: Aikido language, Joe Marshall, 02/03/2004
    • Re: Aikido language, David Allison, 02/03/2004
      • Re: Aikido language, Neelakantan Krishnaswami, 02/03/2004
      • Re: Aikido language, David Allison, 02/03/2004
      • Re: Aikido language, Eli Collins, 02/04/2004
      • Re: Aikido language, Michael St. Hippolyte, 02/04/2004
      • Re: Aikido language, David Allison, 02/04/2004
      • Re: Aikido language, David Suárez de Lis, 02/05/2004
      • Re: Aikido language, David Allison, 02/05/2004
      • Re: Aikido language, Bryn Keller, 02/05/2004
      • Re: Aikido language, Johan Ovlinger, 02/05/2004
      • Re: Aikido language, David Allison, 02/05/2004
      • Re: Aikido language, Scott McKay, 02/05/2004
      • Re: Aikido language, Bryn Keller, 02/05/2004
      • Re: Aikido language, Joe Marshall, 02/05/2004
  • Message not available
    • Re: Aikido language, David Allison, 02/05/2004
• seeking an OO or functional parser generator for Java, Seth Gordon, 01/09/2004
  • Re: seeking an OO or functional parser generator for Java, Dave Lee, 01/09/2004
  • Re: seeking an OO or functional parser generator for Java, Curran Nachbar, 01/09/2004
    • Re: seeking an OO or functional parser generator for Java, Andrae Muys, 01/15/2004
  • Re: seeking an OO or functional parser generator for Java, mcguire, 01/09/2004
  • Re: seeking an OO or functional parser generator for Java, Johan, 01/09/2004
    • Re: seeking an OO or functional parser generator for Java, Lauri Alanko, 01/15/2004
      • Re: seeking an OO or functional parser generator for Java, Johan Ovlinger, 01/15/2004
  • Re: seeking an OO or functional parser generator for Java, Matt Quail, 01/09/2004
  • Re: seeking an OO or functional parser generator for Java, Ken Anderson, 01/15/2004
• LL3 question, Neelakantan Krishnaswami, 01/08/2004
  • Re: LL3 question, Ken Anderson, 01/15/2004
  • Re: LL3 question, Kimberley Burchett, 01/15/2004
• Version 1.3 of my Lisp guide, Pascal Costanza
• More on dispatching by function return type, Ken Shan, 12/16/2003
  • Re: More on dispatching by function return type, Dan Sugalski, 12/16/2003
  • Re: More on dispatching by function return type, Joe Marshall, 12/17/2003
    • Re: More on dispatching by function return type, Ken Shan, 12/17/2003
      • Re: More on dispatching by function return type, Joe Marshall, 12/17/2003
      • Re: More on dispatching by function return type, Ken Shan, 12/17/2003
      • Re: More on dispatching by function return type, Joe Marshall, 12/18/2003
      • Re: More on dispatching by function return type, Ken Shan, 12/18/2003
      • Re: More on dispatching by function return type, Johan, 12/19/2003
      • Re: More on dispatching by function return type, Jon L White\(G\), 01/05/2004
      • [off topic] Re: More on dispatching by function return type, Mike Newhall, 01/05/2004
      • Re: Economics and predicting disastrous "busts" [was: Re: More on dispatching by function return type], Jon L White\(G\), 01/06/2004
      • [even more off topic] Re: More on dispatching by function returntype, Joe Marshall, 01/06/2004
      • Still Economics---Re: [even more off topic] Re: More on dispatching by function return type, Jon L White\(G\), 01/06/2004
      • Re: Still Economics---Re: [even more off topic] Re: More on dispatching by function return type, Tom Lord, 01/06/2004
      • Re: Still Economics---Re: [even more off topic] Re: More ondispatching by function return type, Perry E. Metzger, 01/06/2004
      • Re: Still Economics---Re: [even more off topic] Re: More on dispatching by function return type, James McCartney, 01/07/2004
    • Anyone on ll1-discuss besides spammers?, James McCartney, 04/13/2004
      • Re: Anyone on ll1-discuss besides spammers?, Perry E. Metzger, 04/13/2004
      • Re: Anyone on ll1-discuss besides spammers?, Steve Dekorte, 04/13/2004
      • Re: Anyone on ll1-discuss besides spammers?, mcguire, 04/13/2004
      • Re: Anyone on ll1-discuss besides spammers?, Johan Ovlinger, 04/13/2004
      • Re: Anyone on ll1-discuss besides spammers?, Steve Dekorte, 04/13/2004
      • Re: Anyone on ll1-discuss besides spammers?, Trevis Rothwell, 04/13/2004
      • Re: Anyone on ll1-discuss besides spammers?, Mike Newhall, 04/13/2004
  • Re: More on dispatching by function return type, John Clements, 12/17/2003
    • Re: More on dispatching by function return type, Johan, 12/17/2003
      • Re: More on dispatching by function return type, Pascal Costanza, 12/17/2003
      • Re: More on dispatching by function return type, John Clements, 12/17/2003
      • Re: More on dispatching by function return type, Pascal Costanza, 12/17/2003
      • Re: More on dispatching by function return type, Joe Marshall, 12/17/2003
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: More on dispatching by function return type, Kevin S. Millikin, 12/17/2003
    • RE: More on dispatching by function return type, Dan Sugalski, 12/17/2003
    • Re: More on dispatching by function return type, Joe Marshall, 12/17/2003
  • RE: More on dispatching by function return type, Kevin S. Millikin, 12/17/2003
    • Re: More on dispatching by function return type, John Clements, 12/17/2003
  • RE: More on dispatching by function return type, Kevin S. Millikin, 12/17/2003
  • RE: More on dispatching by function return type, Kevin S. Millikin, 12/17/2003
  • RE: More on dispatching by function return type, Kevin S. Millikin, 12/17/2003
• RE: Typing and semantics [dynamic vs. static typing], Kevin S. Millikin, 12/15/2003
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Typing and semantics [dynamic vs. static typing], Kevin S. Millikin, 12/15/2003
    • Re: Typing and semantics [dynamic vs. static typing], John Clements, 12/17/2003
  • RE: Typing and semantics [dynamic vs. static typing], Kevin S. Millikin, 12/17/2003
    • Re: Typing and semantics [dynamic vs. static typing], John Clements, 12/17/2003
      • Re: Typing and semantics [dynamic vs. static typing], Ken Shan, 12/17/2003
      • Re: Typing and semantics [dynamic vs. static typing], John Clements, 12/17/2003
      • Re: Typing and semantics [dynamic vs. static typing], Ken Shan, 12/17/2003
      • Re: Typing and semantics [dynamic vs. static typing], John Clements, 12/17/2003
      • Re: Typing and semantics [dynamic vs. static typing], Ken Shan, 12/17/2003
      • Re: Typing and semantics [dynamic vs. static typing], John Clements, 12/18/2003
      • Re: Typing and semantics [dynamic vs. static typing], Ken Shan, 12/18/2003
  • RE: Typing and semantics [dynamic vs. static typing], Kevin S. Millikin, 12/17/2003
• Comments Requested on SML-based "Graphics" Little Language, Brent Fulgham, 12/15/2003
  • Re: Comments Requested on SML-based "Graphics" Little Language, Luke Gorrie, 12/16/2003
• mapping data, Russ Ross, 12/09/2003
  • Re: mapping data, Roger Price, 12/09/2003
    • Re: mapping data, Russ Ross, 12/10/2003
  • Re: mapping data, Kimberley Burchett, 12/10/2003
    • Re: mapping data, Dan Sugalski, 12/10/2003
      • Re: mapping data, Russ Ross, 12/11/2003
      • Re: mapping data, Luke Gorrie, 12/17/2003
    • Re: mapping data, Chris Page, 12/10/2003
    • Re: mapping data, Olivier Lefevre, 12/11/2003
  • Re: mapping data, Seth Gordon, 12/12/2003
    • Re: mapping data, Dan Sugalski, 12/12/2003
      • Re: mapping data, Seth Gordon, 12/15/2003
  • Re: mapping data, Steven Shaw, 12/12/2003
    • Re: mapping data, Andrae Muys, 12/16/2003
  • Re: mapping data, Kimberley Burchett, 12/12/2003
• Types: bits vs messages, David Farber
• Question about lexical closures and message passing concurrency., Matthew Estes
• Helium, Olivier Lefevre
• Groovy as an Elle implementation? (was Re: A language idea: Elle), James Strachan
• Practical fallout from types and type inferencing, Dan Sugalski, 11/26/2003
  • Practical fallout from types and type inferencing, Shriram Krishnamurthi, 11/26/2003
  • Re: Practical fallout from types and type inferencing, Christopher Dutchyn, 11/27/2003
• RE: Can we factor out our type systems?, Kevin S. Millikin
• type inference in imperative langauges, Miles Egan, 11/24/2003
  • type inference in imperative langauges, Shriram Krishnamurthi, 11/24/2003
• fielders, fly balls, and formal loop specs, Dave Long
• RE: The Accessibility of Type Theory Research, Lars Bergstrom
• RE: dynamic vs. static typing, Brent Fulgham, 11/19/2003
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Greg Travis, 11/20/2003
  • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Florin Mihaila, 11/22/2003
    • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Roger Price, 11/22/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Chris Page, 11/23/2003
      • Development Environments Matter, Peter J. Wasilko, 11/23/2003
    • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Dave Hudson, 11/23/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Matthias Felleisen, 11/23/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Jim Blandy, 11/24/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Matthias Felleisen, 11/24/2003
  • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Ken Shan, 11/24/2003
    • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Joe Marshall, 11/24/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Ken Shan, 11/24/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Joe Marshall, 11/24/2003
• Re: your mail, Dan Sugalski, 11/18/2003
  • Re: your mail, Daniel Weinreb, 11/18/2003
• RE: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Brent Fulgham, 11/17/2003
  • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Michael Vanier, 11/17/2003
  • RE: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Miles Egan, 11/17/2003
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Brent Fulgham, 11/17/2003
  • RE: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Brent Fulgham, 11/17/2003
  • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Matthias Felleisen, 11/18/2003
    • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Peter van Rooijen, 11/21/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Shriram Krishnamurthi, 11/21/2003
• How to Design (Declarative) Programming Languages, Jenkins, Steven, 11/17/2003
  • Re: How to Design (Declarative) Programming Languages, Scott McKay, 11/17/2003
    • Re: How to Design (Declarative) Programming Languages, Matthias Felleisen, 11/17/2003
      • Re: How to Design (Declarative) Programming Languages, Matthias Felleisen, 11/17/2003
    • Re: How to Design (Declarative) Programming Languages, Shriram Krishnamurthi, 11/17/2003
    • Re: How to Design (Declarative) Programming Languages, Mike Austin, 11/18/2003
      • Re: How to Design (Declarative) Programming Languages, Scott McKay, 11/19/2003
  • Re: How to Design (Declarative) Programming Languages, Jaap Weel, 11/18/2003
  • RE: How to Design (Declarative) Programming Languages, Anton van Straaten, 11/18/2003
  • Re: How to Design (Declarative) Programming Languages, Michael Sperber, 11/22/2003
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: How to Design (Declarative) Programming Languages, Jenkins, Steven, 11/17/2003
• dual-language systems increase modularity, Vadim Nasardinov, 11/16/2003
  • dual-language systems increase modularity, Shriram Krishnamurthi, 11/16/2003
    • Re: dual-language systems increase modularity, sundar, 11/16/2003
      • Re: dual-language systems increase modularity, Michael Vanier, 11/16/2003
      • Re: dual-language systems increase modularity, Steve Dekorte, 11/16/2003
      • Re: dual-language systems increase modularity, Dan Sugalski, 11/16/2003
      • Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Mike Newhall, 11/16/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Michael Vanier, 11/16/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, David Lichteblau, 11/16/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Michael Vanier, 11/16/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Miles Egan, 11/17/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Daniel Weinreb, 11/17/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Miles Egan, 11/17/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Daniel Weinreb, 11/17/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Christopher Barber, 11/17/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Robby Findler, 11/17/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Michael Vanier, 11/17/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Christopher Barber, 11/17/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Neelakantan Krishnaswami, 11/17/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Matthias Felleisen, 11/18/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Neelakantan Krishnaswami, 11/18/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Russ Ross, 11/18/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Michael Vanier, 11/18/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Neelakantan Krishnaswami, 11/18/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Michael Vanier, 11/18/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Neelakantan Krishnaswami, 11/18/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Shriram Krishnamurthi, 11/18/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Matthias Felleisen, 11/18/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Felix Klock's ll1 list proxy, 11/17/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Robby Findler, 11/18/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Christopher Barber, 11/18/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Christopher Barber, 11/17/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Shriram Krishnamurthi, 11/17/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Christopher Barber, 11/18/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Shriram Krishnamurthi, 11/18/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Christopher Barber, 11/18/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Shriram Krishnamurthi, 11/19/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Christopher Barber, 11/21/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, David Farber, 11/17/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Peter J. Wasilko, 11/18/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, David Farber, 11/18/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Miles Egan, 11/19/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, David Farber, 11/19/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Christopher Barber, 11/18/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Michael Vanier, 11/17/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Miles Egan, 11/17/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Matthias Felleisen, 11/17/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Daniel Weinreb, 11/18/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Matthias Felleisen, 11/18/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Pascal Costanza, 11/24/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Matthias Felleisen, 11/24/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Bob Cassels, 11/20/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Daniel Silva, 11/20/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Avi Bryant, 11/20/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Dan Sugalski, 11/17/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Mike Newhall, 11/17/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Dan Sugalski, 11/17/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Mike Newhall, 11/17/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Miles Egan, 11/17/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Dan Sugalski, 11/17/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Jim Blandy, 11/17/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Dan Sugalski, 11/17/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Geoffrey Knauth, 11/20/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Dan Sugalski, 11/20/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, David Lichteblau, 11/17/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Mike Newhall, 11/17/2003
      • Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity, Dan Sugalski, 11/17/2003
      • Re: dual-language systems increase modularity, Miles Egan, 11/16/2003
      • Re: dual-language systems increase modularity, Matthias Felleisen, 11/16/2003
      • Re: dual-language systems increase modularity, Matthias Felleisen, 11/16/2003
      • Re: dual-language systems increase modularity, Shriram Krishnamurthi, 11/16/2003
      • Re: dual-language systems increase modularity, Grant Miner, 11/16/2003
      • Re: dual-language systems increase modularity, Shriram Krishnamurthi, 11/17/2003
      • Re: dual-language systems increase modularity, Peter Seibel, 11/17/2003
      • Re: dual-language systems increase modularity, Steve Dekorte, 11/17/2003
      • Re: dual-language systems increase modularity, Shriram Krishnamurthi, 11/17/2003
      • Re: dual-language systems increase modularity, Steve Dekorte, 11/17/2003
      • Re: dual-language systems increase modularity, Shriram Krishnamurthi, 11/17/2003
      • Re: dual-language systems increase modularity, Steve Dekorte, 11/17/2003
      • Re: dual-language systems increase modularity, Ken Shan, 11/17/2003
      • Re: dual-language systems increase modularity, Ken Shan, 11/17/2003
      • Re: dual-language systems increase modularity, Steve Dekorte, 11/17/2003
      • Re: dual-language systems increase modularity, Ken Shan, 11/18/2003
      • Re: dual-language systems increase modularity, Steve Dekorte, 11/18/2003
      • Re: dual-language systems increase modularity, Shriram Krishnamurthi, 11/18/2003
      • Re: dual-language systems increase modularity, Shriram Krishnamurthi, 11/18/2003
      • Re: dual-language systems increase modularity, Ken Shan, 11/18/2003
      • dynamic vs. static typing, Steve Dekorte, 11/18/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Ken Shan, 11/18/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Steve Dekorte, 11/18/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Ken Shan, 11/18/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Steve Dekorte, 11/19/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Ken Shan, 11/19/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Steve Dekorte, 11/19/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Shriram Krishnamurthi, 11/19/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Steve Dekorte, 11/19/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Ken Shan, 11/19/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Ken Shan, 11/19/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Steve Dekorte, 11/20/2003
      • RE: dynamic vs. static typing, Anton van Straaten, 11/20/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Joe Marshall, 11/21/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Shriram Krishnamurthi, 11/21/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Joe Marshall, 11/21/2003
      • RE: dynamic vs. static typing, Anton van Straaten, 11/21/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Jan-Willem Maessen, 11/21/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Ken Shan, 11/20/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Steve Dekorte, 11/20/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Ken Shan, 11/20/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], Steve Dekorte, 11/20/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], Ken Shan, 11/20/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], Steve Dekorte, 11/20/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], Shriram Krishnamurthi, 11/20/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], Steve Dekorte, 11/20/2003
      • RE: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], Anton van Straaten, 11/20/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], Ken Shan, 11/20/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], Steve Dekorte, 11/26/2003
      • RE: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], Anton van Straaten, 11/26/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], Steve Dekorte, 11/26/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], Ken Shan, 11/26/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], Pascal Costanza, 12/01/2003
      • RE: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], Anton van Straaten, 12/09/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], Steve Dekorte, 12/09/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], Ken Shan, 12/09/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], Tom Lord, 12/09/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], Ken Shan, 12/09/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], Chris Page, 12/09/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], Ken Shan, 12/09/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], Chris Page, 12/09/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], Dan Sugalski, 12/10/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], Avi Bryant, 12/09/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], Chris Page, 12/09/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], Mike Austin, 12/09/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], Tom Lord, 12/09/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], Ken Shan, 12/09/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], Jeremy H. Brown, 12/09/2003
      • RE: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], Tom Locke, 12/10/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], Pascal Costanza, 12/10/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], Felix Klock's ll1 list proxy, 12/10/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], Felix Klock's ll1 list proxy, 12/10/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], Joe Marshall, 12/10/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], Pascal Costanza, 12/11/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], Ken Shan, 12/10/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], FranklinChen, 12/10/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], Ken Shan, 12/10/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], FranklinChen, 12/10/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], Ken Shan, 12/11/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], FranklinChen, 12/11/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], Ken Shan, 12/11/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], FranklinChen, 12/11/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], Ken Shan, 12/11/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], FranklinChen, 12/12/2003
      • Extensible syntax, Tom Locke, 12/11/2003
      • Re: Extensible syntax, Pascal Costanza, 12/11/2003
      • RE: Extensible syntax, Tom Locke, 12/11/2003
      • Re: Extensible syntax, Brian T Rice, 12/11/2003
      • Re: Extensible syntax, Bob Cassels, 12/11/2003
      • Re: Extensible syntax, Matt Hellige, 12/11/2003
      • Re: Extensible syntax, Christopher Dutchyn, 12/11/2003
      • Re: Extensible syntax, Kimberley Burchett, 12/11/2003
      • Re: Extensible syntax, Michael Vanier, 12/11/2003
      • Re: Extensible syntax, Chris Page, 12/11/2003
      • RE: Extensible syntax, Tom Locke, 12/11/2003
      • Re: Extensible syntax, Chris Page, 12/12/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], Tom Lord, 12/10/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], Chris Page, 12/10/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], Pascal Costanza, 12/11/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], John Clements, 12/15/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], John Clements, 12/15/2003
      • Typing and semantics [dynamic vs. static typing], Jan-Willem Maessen, 12/15/2003
      • Re: Typing and semantics [dynamic vs. static typing], John Clements, 12/15/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], Joe Marshall, 12/15/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], Neelakantan Krishnaswami, 12/15/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], John Clements, 12/15/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], Joe Marshall, 12/15/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], Peter van Rooijen, 12/15/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], Pascal Costanza, 12/16/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], Peter van Rooijen, 12/16/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], Pascal Costanza, 12/16/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], Joe Marshall, 12/16/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], Chris Page, 12/09/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], Ken Shan, 12/10/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], Chris Page, 12/10/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], Ken Shan, 11/26/2003
      • Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing], Joe Marshall, 11/26/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, James McCartney, 11/19/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Ken Shan, 11/19/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, James McCartney, 11/19/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Ken Shan, 11/19/2003
      • The Accessibility of Type Theory Research, Peter J. Wasilko, 11/19/2003
      • Re: The Accessibility of Type Theory Research, Peter J. Wasilko, 11/19/2003
      • The Accessibility of Type Theory Research, Shriram Krishnamurthi, 11/19/2003
      • Of Legal Language and CS Notation, Peter J. Wasilko, 11/20/2003
      • Of Legal Language and CS Notation, Shriram Krishnamurthi, 11/20/2003
      • Re: Of Legal Language and CS Notation, Daniel Weinreb, 11/20/2003
      • Re: Of Legal Language and CS Notation, Peter J. Wasilko, 11/21/2003
      • RE: Of Legal Language and CS Notation, Anton van Straaten, 11/21/2003
      • Re: Of Legal Language and CS Notation, Ken Shan, 11/22/2003
      • Re: Of Legal Language and CS Notation, Peter J. Wasilko, 11/21/2003
      • Re: Of Legal Language and CS Notation, Ken Shan, 11/21/2003
      • English as a lightweight language (was: Of Legal Language and CSNotation), Vadim Nasardinov, 11/22/2003
      • RE: Of Legal Language and CS Notation, Anton van Straaten, 11/20/2003
      • Re: Of Legal Language and CS Notation, Olivier Lefevre, 11/22/2003
      • Re: Of Legal Language and CS Notation, Geoffrey Knauth, 11/24/2003
      • Re: The Accessibility of Type Theory Research, Russ Ross, 11/20/2003
      • Re: The Accessibility of Type Theory Research, Daniel Yokomiso, 11/20/2003
      • Re: The Accessibility of Type Theory Research, Peter J. Wasilko, 11/20/2003
      • Re: The Accessibility of Type Theory Research, Daniel Yokomiso, 11/20/2003
      • Re: The Accessibility of Type Theory Research, Steve Dekorte, 11/20/2003
      • Re: The Accessibility of Type Theory Research, Daniel Yokomiso, 11/21/2003
      • Re: The Accessibility of Type Theory Research, James McCartney, 11/20/2003
      • Re: The Accessibility of Type Theory Research, Ken Shan, 11/20/2003
      • Re: The Accessibility of Type Theory Research, James McCartney, 11/20/2003
      • Re: The Accessibility of Type Theory Research, Ken Shan, 11/20/2003
      • RE: The Accessibility of Type Theory Research, Anton van Straaten, 11/21/2003
      • Re: The Accessibility of Type Theory Research, James McCartney, 11/21/2003
      • RE: The Accessibility of Type Theory Research, Anton van Straaten, 11/21/2003
      • Re: The Accessibility of Type Theory Research, Christopher Barber, 11/21/2003
      • Re: The Accessibility of Type Theory Research, Ken Shan, 11/19/2003
      • Re: The Accessibility of Type Theory Research, Peter J. Wasilko, 11/20/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, David Farber, 11/19/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, James McCartney, 11/19/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Ken Shan, 11/19/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Pascal Costanza, 11/24/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Ken Shan, 11/24/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Pascal Costanza, 11/25/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Daniel Yokomiso, 11/25/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Daniel Yokomiso, 11/25/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Shriram Krishnamurthi, 11/25/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Pascal Costanza, 11/25/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Ken Shan, 11/25/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, John Clements, 11/19/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Ken Shan, 11/19/2003
      • RE: dynamic vs. static typing, Anton van Straaten, 11/19/2003
      • RE: dynamic vs. static typing, Anton van Straaten, 11/18/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Joe Marshall, 11/20/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Peter J. Wasilko, 11/20/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Joe Marshall, 11/20/2003
      • RE: dynamic vs. static typing, Anton van Straaten, 11/20/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Joe Marshall, 11/20/2003
      • RE: dynamic vs. static typing, Anton van Straaten, 11/20/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Jakub Travnik, 11/20/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Scott McKay, 11/20/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Bob Cassels, 11/20/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Paul F. Dietz, 11/25/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Pascal Costanza, 11/25/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Joe Marshall, 11/20/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Matt Hellige, 11/20/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Peter van Rooijen, 11/21/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Neelakantan Krishnaswami, 11/21/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Matt Hellige, 11/21/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Neelakantan Krishnaswami, 11/21/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Mike Austin, 11/21/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Matt Hellige, 11/21/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Mike Austin, 11/22/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Joe Marshall, 11/24/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Matt Hellige, 11/24/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Dan Sugalski, 11/24/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Ken Shan, 11/24/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Joe Marshall, 11/24/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Steve Dekorte, 11/24/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Matt Hellige, 11/24/2003
      • RE: dynamic vs. static typing, Anton van Straaten, 11/24/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Steve Dekorte, 11/24/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Joe Marshall, 11/24/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Steve Dekorte, 11/24/2003
      • RE: dynamic vs. static typing, Anton van Straaten, 11/24/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Peter Seibel, 11/24/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Joe Marshall, 11/24/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Jim Blandy, 11/24/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Joe Marshall, 11/25/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Pascal Costanza, 11/24/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Matt Hellige, 11/25/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Steve Dekorte, 11/25/2003
      • RE: dynamic vs. static typing, Anton van Straaten, 11/25/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Steve Dekorte, 11/25/2003
      • RE: dynamic vs. static typing, Anton van Straaten, 11/25/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Pascal Costanza, 11/25/2003
      • RE: dynamic vs. static typing, Anton van Straaten, 11/25/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Neelakantan Krishnaswami, 11/25/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Pascal Costanza, 11/30/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Paul F. Dietz, 11/25/2003
      • RE: dynamic vs. static typing, Anton van Straaten, 11/25/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Paul F. Dietz, 11/25/2003
      • RE: dynamic vs. static typing, Anton van Straaten, 11/25/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Howard Stearns, 11/25/2003
      • RE: dynamic vs. static typing, Anton van Straaten, 11/26/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Joe Marshall, 11/26/2003
      • RE: dynamic vs. static typing, Anton van Straaten, 11/26/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Joe Marshall, 11/26/2003
      • RE: dynamic vs. static typing, Anton van Straaten, 11/26/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, John Clements, 11/26/2003
      • RE: dynamic vs. static typing, Anton van Straaten, 11/26/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Felix Klock's ll1 proxy, 11/26/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Derek Elkins, 11/27/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Geoffrey Knauth, 11/30/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Matthias Felleisen, 11/30/2003
      • RE: dynamic vs. static typing, Dan Sugalski, 11/26/2003
      • RE: dynamic vs. static typing, Shriram Krishnamurthi, 11/30/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Neelakantan Krishnaswami, 12/02/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Peter van Rooijen, 11/26/2003
      • RE: dynamic vs. static typing, Anton van Straaten, 11/26/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Peter van Rooijen, 11/26/2003
      • RE: dynamic vs. static typing, Anton van Straaten, 12/09/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Guy Steele, 12/09/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Pascal Costanza, 12/09/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Pascal Costanza, 11/30/2003
      • RE: dynamic vs. static typing, Anton van Straaten, 12/08/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Pascal Costanza, 12/09/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Michael Vanier, 11/26/2003
      • RE: dynamic vs. static typing, Anton van Straaten, 11/26/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Dan Sugalski, 11/26/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Steve Dekorte, 11/26/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Alexander Schmolck, 11/26/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, mcguire, 11/25/2003
      • measuring dynamic vs. static typing effectiveness, Howard Stearns, 11/25/2003
      • Re: measuring dynamic vs. static typing effectiveness, Tom Lord, 11/25/2003
      • Re: measuring dynamic vs. static typing effectiveness, Matthias Felleisen, 11/25/2003
      • Can we factor out our type systems?, Peter J. Wasilko, 11/26/2003
      • Re: Can we factor out our type systems?, Joe Marshall, 11/26/2003
      • Re: Can we factor out our type systems?, Colin Putney, 11/26/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Doug Landauer, 11/25/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Pascal Costanza, 11/25/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Christopher Barber, 11/25/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Howard Stearns, 11/25/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Steven Grady, 11/25/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Pascal Costanza, 11/25/2003
      • RE: dynamic vs. static typing, Anton van Straaten, 11/25/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Pascal Costanza, 11/30/2003
      • RE: dynamic vs. static typing, Anton van Straaten, 12/08/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Pascal Costanza, 12/09/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Joe Marshall, 11/25/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Ken Shan, 11/24/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Steve Dekorte, 11/24/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Ken Shan, 11/24/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Eli Collins, 01/08/2004
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Jeremy H. Brown, 01/08/2004
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Ken Shan, 11/20/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Joe Marshall, 11/20/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Ken Shan, 11/20/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Joe Marshall, 11/21/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Ken Shan, 11/21/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Joe Marshall, 11/21/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Ken Shan, 11/21/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Russ Ross, 11/21/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Joe Marshall, 11/21/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Ken Shan, 11/21/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Matt Hellige, 11/21/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, Joe Marshall, 11/21/2003
      • Re: dynamic vs. static typing, mcguire, 11/20/2003
      • dynamic vs. static typing, Shriram Krishnamurthi, 11/18/2003
      • Re: dual-language systems increase modularity, Shriram Krishnamurthi, 11/17/2003
      • Re: dual-language systems increase modularity, Steve Dekorte, 11/17/2003
      • Re: dual-language systems increase modularity, Matthias Felleisen, 11/18/2003
      • Re: dual-language systems increase modularity, Miles Egan, 11/18/2003
      • Re: dual-language systems increase modularity, Matthias Felleisen, 11/18/2003
      • Re: dual-language systems increase modularity, Francois-Rene Rideau, 11/18/2003
      • Re: dual-language systems increase modularity, Steve Dekorte, 11/18/2003
      • Message not available
      • Re: dual-language systems increase modularity, Steve Dekorte, 11/18/2003
      • Re: dual-language systems increase modularity, Vadim Nasardinov, 11/19/2003
      • Re: dual-language systems increase modularity, Shriram Krishnamurthi, 11/18/2003
      • Re: antipathy to type systems, Olivier Lefevre, 11/18/2003
      • Re: antipathy to type systems, Shriram Krishnamurthi, 11/18/2003
      • Re: dual-language systems increase modularity, Pascal Costanza, 11/24/2003
      • Re: dual-language systems increase modularity, Shriram Krishnamurthi, 11/16/2003
    • Re: dual-language systems increase modularity, Tom Lord, 11/16/2003
  • Re: dual-language systems increase modularity, sundar, 11/16/2003
  • Re: dual-language systems increase modularity, Daniel Pinto de Mello e Silva, 11/16/2003
  • Re: dual-language systems increase modularity, Dan Sugalski, 11/16/2003
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: dual-language systems increase modularity, Brent Fulgham, 11/17/2003
• LL3 Notes, Jay McCarthy
• Parking for LL3, Ken Anderson
• LL3 video feed, Neelakantan Krishnaswami, 11/05/2003
  • Re: LL3 video feed, Ken Anderson, 11/05/2003
• RE: LL3 hotel suggestions, Shapiro, Jonathan, 11/05/2003
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: LL3 hotel suggestions, Peter van Rooijen, 11/05/2003
• functional languages ill-suited for large programs?, Vadim Nasardinov, 10/31/2003
  • Re: functional languages ill-suited for large programs?, Jim Blandy, 10/31/2003
    • Re: functional languages ill-suited for large programs?, Jan-Willem Maessen, 10/31/2003
      • Re: functional languages ill-suited for large programs?, Pascal Costanza, 10/31/2003
    • Re: functional languages ill-suited for large programs?, Perry E. Metzger, 10/31/2003
      • Re: functional languages ill-suited for large programs?, Robby Findler, 10/31/2003
      • Re: functional languages ill-suited for large programs?, vkarvone, 10/31/2003
      • Re: functional languages ill-suited for large programs?, Ken Shan, 11/01/2003
      • Re: functional languages ill-suited for large programs?, vkarvone, 11/01/2003
      • Re: functional languages ill-suited for large programs?, Tom Lord, 11/01/2003
      • Re: functional languages ill-suited for large programs?, Jim Blandy, 11/02/2003
      • Re: functional languages ill-suited for large programs?, Michael St. Hippolyte, 11/04/2003
      • Re: functional languages ill-suited for large programs?, vkarvone, 10/31/2003
      • Re: functional languages ill-suited for large programs?, Dan Sugalski, 11/01/2003
      • Re: functional languages ill-suited for large programs?, vkarvone, 11/01/2003
      • Re: functional languages ill-suited for large programs?, Jim Blandy, 10/31/2003
      • Re: functional languages ill-suited for large programs?, Alan Bawden, 10/31/2003
      • Re: functional languages ill-suited for large programs?, Michael Vanier, 10/31/2003
      • Re: functional languages ill-suited for large programs?, Neelakantan Krishnaswami, 10/31/2003
      • Re: functional languages ill-suited for large programs?, Jim Blandy, 11/01/2003
      • Re: functional languages ill-suited for large programs?, Alan Bawden, 11/02/2003
      • Re: functional languages ill-suited for large programs?, Jim Blandy, 11/02/2003
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: functional languages ill-suited for large programs?, Brent Fulgham, 10/31/2003
    • Re: functional languages ill-suited for large programs?, Jan-Willem Maessen, 10/31/2003
      • Re: functional languages ill-suited for large programs?, Pascal Costanza, 10/31/2003
      • Re: functional languages ill-suited for large programs?, Jan-Willem Maessen, 11/04/2003
      • Re: functional languages ill-suited for large programs?, Pascal Costanza, 11/04/2003
  • Re: functional languages ill-suited for large programs?, Peter van Rooijen, 11/04/2003
    • LL3 hotel suggestions, Peter van Rooijen, 11/04/2003
      • Re: LL3 hotel suggestions, Ken Shan, 11/05/2003
      • Re: LL3 hotel suggestions, Dan Sugalski, 11/05/2003
      • Re: LL3 hotel suggestions, Steven Grady, 11/05/2003
      • Re: LL3 hotel suggestions, David Cohen, 11/05/2003
      • Re: LL3 hotel suggestions, Mike Newhall, 11/05/2003
      • Re: LL3 hotel suggestions, Dan Sugalski, 11/06/2003
      • Re: LL3 hotel suggestions, Mike Newhall, 11/06/2003
      • Re: LL3 hotel suggestions, Vadim Nasardinov, 11/05/2003
      • Re: LL3 hotel suggestions, Jamie Raymond, 11/05/2003
      • Re: LL3 hotel suggestions, Mike Newhall, 11/05/2003
      • Re: LL3 hotel suggestions, Peter van Rooijen, 11/05/2003
      • RE: LL3 hotel suggestions, Anton van Straaten, 11/05/2003
    • Re: functional languages ill-suited for large programs?, Daniel Yokomiso, 11/05/2003
  • Re: functional languages ill-suited for large programs?, Greg Travis, 11/05/2003
• Scheme Workshop 2003 - Final Call for Participation, Matthew Flatt
• LL3, Nov. 8, 2003, Call for participation, Jeremy Hylton, 10/26/2003
  • Re: LL3, Nov. 8, 2003, Call for participation, andrew cooke, 10/26/2003
    • Re: LL3, Nov. 8, 2003, Call for participation, Jeremy Hylton, 10/26/2003
  • Re: LL3, Nov. 8, 2003, Call for participation, Andrae Muys, 10/26/2003
  • Re: LL3, Nov. 8, 2003, Call for participation, Matthew Estes, 10/27/2003
    • Re: LL3, Nov. 8, 2003, Call for participation, Tom Lord, 10/27/2003
      • Re: LL3, Nov. 8, 2003, Call for participation, Shriram Krishnamurthi, 10/27/2003
    • Re: LL3, Nov. 8, 2003, Call for participation, Dan Sugalski, 10/27/2003
      • Re: LL3, Nov. 8, 2003, Call for participation, Yusuke Shinyama, 10/27/2003
• CL packages, Daniel Weinreb, 10/25/2003
  • Re: CL packages, Gary King, 10/25/2003
    • Re: CL packages, Joe Marshall, 10/27/2003
      • Re: CL packages, David Cohen, 10/27/2003
• packages, modules, etc..., Gary King, 10/25/2003
  • Re: packages, modules, etc..., mcguire, 10/26/2003
• AOSD'03 keynote talk, and DSF again, Pascal Costanza
• algebra rhyme, Dave Long
• CFP: LL3; Submission deadline Oct. 17, Jeremy Hylton
• RE: [aosd-discuss] Dynamically scoped functions, Gregor Kiczales, 09/29/2003
  • Re: [aosd-discuss] Dynamically scoped functions, Luke Gorrie, 09/29/2003
    • RE: [aosd-discuss] Dynamically scoped functions, Gregor Kiczales, 09/29/2003
    • Re: [aosd-discuss] Dynamically scoped functions, Dan Moniz, 10/05/2003
      • RE: [aosd-discuss] Dynamically scoped functions, Gregor Kiczales, 10/05/2003
  • Re: [aosd-discuss] Dynamically scoped functions, Pascal Costanza, 09/30/2003
    • Re: [aosd-discuss] Dynamically scoped functions, Pascal Costanza, 09/30/2003
      • RE: [aosd-discuss] Dynamically scoped functions, Gregor Kiczales, 09/30/2003
      • Re: [aosd-discuss] Dynamically scoped functions, Pascal Costanza, 09/30/2003
• Dynamically scoped functions, Pascal Costanza
• Long term prediction with layers of recurrent neural network systems, arnoud
• Lightweight Languages 2003 (LL3) CFP, Jeremy Hylton
• Parsers for Programming Languages., Matthew Estes, 09/16/2003
  • Re: Parsers for Programming Languages., Robert Feldt, 09/16/2003
    • Re: Parsers for Programming Languages., Matthew Estes, 09/17/2003
      • Re: Parsers for Programming Languages., Robert Feldt, 09/17/2003
  • Re: Parsers for Programming Languages., Stéphane Payrard, 09/17/2003
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Parsers for Programming Languages., Michael St . Hippolyte, 09/17/2003
    • Re: Parsers for Programming Languages., Matthew Estes, 09/18/2003
      • OFF-TOPIC: Looking for a Lisp-related job?, sundar, 09/18/2003
• Continuations reading group, Ken Shan
• Re: why tail recursion matters (but not much), Matthias Felleisen
• Re: why tail recursion matters, Guy Steele - Sun Microsystems Labs
• Re: OO should break when broken, Guy Steele - Sun Microsystems Labs, 09/04/2003
  • Re: OO should break when broken, Colin Putney, 09/04/2003
  • Re: OO should break when broken, Marc Battyani, 09/04/2003
    • Re: OO should break when broken, Chris Page, 09/05/2003
• Typo, Guy Steele - Sun Microsystems Labs
• Re: why tail recursion matters and why Java isn't it, was Re: lisp performance was Re: problems with lisp, Guy Steele - Sun Microsystems Labs, 09/04/2003
  • Re: why tail recursion matters and why Java isn't it, was Re: lispperformance was Re: problems with lisp, Pascal Costanza, 09/04/2003
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: why tail recursion matters and why Java isn't it, was Re: lisp performance was Re: problems with lisp, Guy Steele - Sun Microsystems Labs, 09/04/2003
    • Re: why tail recursion matters and why Java isn't it, was Re: lispperformance was Re: problems with lisp, Pascal Costanza, 09/04/2003
  • Re: why tail recursion matters and why Java isn't it, was Re: lisp performance was Re: problems with lisp, Guy Steele - Sun Microsystems Labs, 09/04/2003
    • Re: why tail recursion matters and why Java isn't it, was Re: lisp performance was Re: problems with lisp, Perry E. Metzger, 09/04/2003
    • Re: why tail recursion matters and why Java isn't it, was Re: lisp performance was Re: problems with lisp, Peter Seibel, 09/04/2003
      • Re: why tail recursion matters and why Java isn't it, was Re: lispperformance was Re: problems with lisp, Michael Sperber, 09/05/2003
  • Re: why tail recursion matters and why Java isn't it, was Re: lisp performance was Re: problems with lisp, Guy Steele - Sun Microsystems Labs, 09/04/2003
    • Re: why tail recursion matters and why Java isn't it, was Re: lispperformance was Re: problems with lisp, Pascal Costanza, 09/11/2003
  • Re: why tail recursion matters and why Java isn't it, was Re: lisp performance was Re: problems with lisp, Guy Steele - Sun Microsystems Labs, 09/04/2003
    • Re: why tail recursion matters and why Java isn't it, was Re: lispperformance was Re: problems with lisp, Pascal Costanza, 09/04/2003
      • Re: why tail recursion matters and why Java isn't it, was Re: lispperformance was Re: problems with lisp, Michael Vanier, 09/04/2003
      • The Highlander Principle, Peter J. Wasilko, Esq., 09/05/2003
      • Re: The Highlander Principle, Steve Dekorte, 09/05/2003
      • Re: why tail recursion matters and why Java isn't it, was Re: lisp performance was Re: problems with lisp, Michael St . Hippolyte, 09/07/2003
  • Re: why tail recursion matters and why Java isn't it, was Re: lisp performance was Re: problems with lisp, Guy Steele - Sun Microsystems Labs, 09/04/2003
    • Re: why tail recursion matters and why Java isn't it, was Re: lispperformance was Re: problems with lisp, Pascal Costanza, 09/04/2003
    • Re: why tail recursion matters and why Java isn't it, was Re: lispperformance was Re: problems with lisp, Pascal Costanza, 09/04/2003
    • Re: why tail recursion matters and why Java isn't it, was Re: lisp performance was Re: problems with lisp, Matthias Felleisen, 09/04/2003
    • Re: why tail recursion matters, Vadim Nasardinov, 09/05/2003
  • Re: why tail recursion matters and why Java isn't it, was Re: lisp performance was Re: problems with lisp, Guy Steele - Sun Microsystems Labs, 09/04/2003
    • Re: why tail recursion matters and why Java isn't it, was Re: lisp performance was Re: problems with lisp, Bruce Lewis, 09/04/2003
  • Re: why tail recursion matters and why Java isn't it, was Re: lisp performance was Re: problems with lisp, Guy Steele - Sun Microsystems Labs, 09/05/2003
• Re: OO should break when broken (was re: the benefits of immutability), Michael St . Hippolyte, 09/02/2003
  • Re: OO should break when broken (was re: the benefits of immutability), vkarvone, 09/03/2003
    • polymorphic supertyping, Michael St . Hippolyte, 09/03/2003
• OO should break when broken(was re: the benefits of immutability), Michael St . Hippolyte, 09/01/2003
  • Re: OO should break when broken(was re: the benefits of immutability), Colin Putney, 09/01/2003
    • Re: OO should break when broken(was re: the benefits of immutability), Geoffrey Knauth, 09/01/2003
      • Re: OO should break when broken(was re: the benefits of immutability), Steven Shaw, 09/01/2003
      • Re: OO should break when broken(was re: the benefits of immutability), Colin Putney, 09/01/2003
      • Re: OO should break when broken(was re: the benefits of immutability), vkarvone, 09/01/2003
      • Re: OO should break when broken, Colin Putney, 09/01/2003
      • Re: OO should break when broken, vkarvone, 09/02/2003
      • Re: OO should break when broken, Colin Putney, 09/03/2003
      • Re: OO should break when broken, John Clements, 09/04/2003
      • Re: OO should break when broken, Colin Putney, 09/04/2003
      • Re: OO should break when broken, John Clements, 09/04/2003
      • Re: OO should break when broken, Colin Putney, 09/04/2003
      • Re: OO should break when broken, John Clements, 09/04/2003
      • Re: OO should break when broken(was re: the benefits of immutability), James McCartney, 09/01/2003
      • Re: OO should break when broken(was re: the benefits ofimmutability), Dan Sugalski, 09/01/2003
      • Re: OO should break when broken(was re: the benefits of immutability), Geoffrey Knauth, 09/01/2003
      • Re: OO should break when broken(was re: the benefits of immutability), James McCartney, 09/01/2003
      • Re: OO should break when broken, Colin Putney, 09/01/2003
    • Re: OO should break when broken(was re: the benefits of immutability), vkarvone, 09/01/2003
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: OO should break when broken(was re: the benefits of immutability), Asokan Pichai, 09/02/2003
• Re: lisp performance was Re: problems with lisp, Peter Seibel, 08/31/2003
  • Re: lisp performance was Re: problems with lisp, Vadim Nasardinov, 09/01/2003
    • Re: lisp performance was Re: problems with lisp, Kevin Kelleher, 09/02/2003
  • Re: lisp performance was Re: problems with lisp, Russ Ross, 09/01/2003
    • Re: lisp performance was Re: problems with lisp, Peter Seibel, 09/01/2003
      • Re: lisp performance was Re: problems with lisp, Ken Anderson, 09/02/2003
      • why tail recursion matters and why Java isn't it, was Re: lisp performance was Re: problems with lisp, Matthias Felleisen, 09/02/2003
      • Re: why tail recursion matters and why Java isn't it, was Re: lisp performance was Re: problems with lisp, Peter Seibel, 09/03/2003
      • Re: why tail recursion matters and why Java isn't it, Vadim Nasardinov, 09/03/2003
      • Re: why tail recursion matters and why Java isn't it, was Re: lisp performance was Re: problems with lisp, Matthias Felleisen, 09/04/2003
      • Re: why tail recursion matters and why Java isn't it, was Re: lispperformance was Re: problems with lisp, Pascal Costanza, 09/04/2003
      • Re: why tail recursion matters and why Java isn't it, was Re: lisp performance was Re: problems with lisp, Matthias Felleisen, 09/04/2003
      • Re: why tail recursion matters and why Java isn't it, was Re: lispperformance was Re: problems with lisp, Pascal Costanza, 09/04/2003
      • Re: why tail recursion matters and why Java isn't it, was Re: lisp performance was Re: problems with lisp, Matthias Felleisen, 09/04/2003
      • Re: why tail recursion matters and why Java isn't it, was Re: lispperformance was Re: problems with lisp, Pascal Costanza, 09/04/2003
      • Re: why tail recursion matters and why Java isn't it, was Re: lispperformance was Re: problems with lisp, Michael Sperber, 09/04/2003
      • Re: why tail recursion matters and why Java isn't it, was Re: lispperformance was Re: problems with lisp, Pascal Costanza, 09/04/2003
      • Re: why tail recursion matters and why Java isn't it, was Re: lispperformance was Re: problems with lisp, Michael Sperber, 09/04/2003
      • Re: why tail recursion matters and why Java isn't it, was Re: lispperformance was Re: problems with lisp, Pascal Costanza, 09/04/2003
      • Re: why tail recursion matters and why Java isn't it, was Re: lisp performance was Re: problems with lisp, David Herman, 09/04/2003
      • Re: why tail recursion matters and why Java isn't it, was Re: lispperformance was Re: problems with lisp, Pascal Costanza, 09/04/2003
      • Re: why tail recursion matters and why Java isn't it, was Re: lisp performance was Re: problems with lisp, John Clements, 09/04/2003
      • Re: why tail recursion matters and why Java isn't it, was Re: lispperformance was Re: problems with lisp, Michael Sperber, 09/04/2003
      • Re: why tail recursion matters and why Java isn't it, was Re: lispperformance was Re: problems with lisp, Shriram Krishnamurthi, 09/04/2003
      • Re: why tail recursion matters and why Java isn't it, was Re: lispperformance was Re: problems with lisp, Pascal Costanza, 09/04/2003
      • Re: why tail recursion matters and why Java isn't it, was Re: lispperformance was Re: problems with lisp, Michael Sperber, 09/04/2003
      • Re: why tail recursion matters and why Java isn't it,was Re: lisp performance was Re: problems with lisp, Avi Bryant, 09/04/2003
      • Re: why tail recursion matters and why Java isn't it, was Re: lisp performance was Re: problems with lisp, Matthias Felleisen, 09/04/2003
      • Re: why tail recursion matters and why Java isn't it, was Re: lispperformance was Re: problems with lisp, Pascal Costanza, 09/04/2003
      • Re: why tail recursion matters and why Java isn't it, was Re: lispperformance was Re: problems with lisp, Pascal Costanza, 09/04/2003
      • Re: why tail recursion matters and why Java isn't it, was Re: lispperformance was Re: problems with lisp, Michael Sperber, 09/04/2003
      • Re: why tail recursion matters and why Java isn't it, was Re: lispperformance was Re: problems with lisp, Pascal Costanza, 09/04/2003
      • Re: why tail recursion matters and why Java isn't it, was Re:lisp performance was Re: problems with lisp, Scott McKay, 09/04/2003
      • Re: why tail recursion matters and why Java isn't it, was Re: lispperformance was Re: problems with lisp, Pascal Costanza, 09/04/2003
      • Re: lisp performance was Re: problems with lisp, Russ Ross, 09/03/2003
      • Re: lisp performance was Re: problems with lisp, Peter Seibel, 09/03/2003
• (lambda (hobo) ... off-topic), Geoffrey Knauth, 08/27/2003
  • Re: (lambda (hobo) ... off-topic), Scott McKay, 08/27/2003
• RE: Parens Shock, Kevin S. Millikin, 08/22/2003
  • Re: Parens Shock, Michael Vanier, 08/22/2003
• problems with lisp, Russ Ross, 08/22/2003
  • Re: problems with lisp, Pascal Costanza, 08/22/2003
    • Re: problems with lisp, Russ Ross, 08/22/2003
      • Re: problems with lisp, Pascal Costanza, 08/22/2003
    • Re: problems with lisp, Piers Cawley, 08/23/2003
      • Re: problems with lisp, Pascal Costanza, 08/23/2003
  • Re: problems with lisp, Joe Marshall, 08/22/2003
  • lisp performance was Re: problems with lisp, Ken Anderson, 08/25/2003
    • Re: lisp performance was Re: problems with lisp, Michael Vanier, 08/25/2003
      • Re: lisp performance was Re: problems with lisp, vkarvone, 08/25/2003
    • Re: lisp performance was Re: problems with lisp, Matthias Felleisen, 08/25/2003
      • Re: lisp performance was Re: problems with lisp, Ken Anderson, 08/28/2003
      • Re: lisp performance was Re: problems with lisp, Matthias Felleisen, 08/28/2003
      • Re: lisp performance was Re: problems with lisp, Russ Ross, 08/28/2003
      • Re: lisp performance was Re: problems with lisp, Martin ``rydis'' Rydstr|m, 08/28/2003
      • Re: lisp performance was Re: problems with lisp, Joe Marshall, 08/29/2003
      • Re: lisp performance was Re: problems with lisp, Ken Anderson, 08/29/2003
• Java GOOD -- Fire BAD, Jerry Jackson, 08/20/2003
  • Re: Java GOOD -- Fire BAD, Joe Marshall, 08/20/2003
    • Re: Java GOOD -- Fire BAD, Jerry Jackson, 08/20/2003
      • Re: Java GOOD -- Fire BAD, Perry E. Metzger, 08/20/2003
      • Re: Java GOOD -- Fire BAD, Colin Putney, 08/20/2003
      • Re: Java GOOD -- Fire BAD, Michael Vanier, 08/20/2003
      • Re: Java GOOD -- Fire BAD, Perry E. Metzger, 08/20/2003
      • Modern Memory Configurations - was :: Re: Java GOOD -- Fire BAD, Peter J. Wasilko, Esq., 08/21/2003
      • Re: Modern Memory Configurations - was :: Re: Java GOOD -- Fire BAD, Mike Newhall, 08/21/2003
      • Re: Modern Memory Configurations - was :: Re: Java GOOD -- Fire BAD, Russ Ross, 08/21/2003
    • Re: Java GOOD -- Fire BAD, Perry E. Metzger, 08/20/2003
      • Message not available
      • Re: Java GOOD -- Fire BAD, Joe Marshall, 08/20/2003
      • Re: Java GOOD -- Fire BAD, Perry E. Metzger, 08/20/2003
      • Message not available
      • Re: Java GOOD -- Fire BAD, Perry E. Metzger, 08/20/2003
      • Re: Java GOOD -- Fire BAD, Adam Turoff, 08/20/2003
      • Re: Java GOOD -- Fire BAD, Michael Vanier, 08/20/2003
      • Re: Java GOOD -- Fire BAD, Perry E. Metzger, 08/20/2003
      • Re: Java GOOD -- Fire BAD, Steve Dekorte, 08/20/2003
      • Re: Java GOOD -- Fire BAD, Perry E. Metzger, 08/20/2003
      • Re: Java GOOD -- Fire BAD, David Cohen, 08/20/2003
      • Re: Java GOOD -- Fire BAD, Joe Marshall, 08/21/2003
      • Re: Java GOOD -- Fire BAD, sundar, 08/21/2003
      • Re: Java GOOD -- Fire BAD, Perry E. Metzger, 08/21/2003
      • Language support companies (Was: Java GOOD -- Fire BAD), Laurent GUERBY, 08/21/2003
      • Re: Language support companies (Was: Java GOOD -- Fire BAD), Perry E. Metzger, 08/21/2003
      • Re: Language support companies (Was: Java GOOD -- Fire BAD), Bob Bane, 08/21/2003
      • RE: Java GOOD -- Fire BAD, Ziv Caspi, 08/22/2003
      • RE: Java GOOD -- Fire BAD, Scott McKay, 08/22/2003
      • RE: Java GOOD -- Fire BAD, Ziv Caspi, 08/23/2003
      • Message not available
      • Re: Java GOOD -- Fire BAD, Joe Marshall, 08/22/2003
      • Re: Java GOOD -- Fire BAD, Christopher Barber, 08/21/2003
      • Re: Java GOOD -- Fire BAD, Perry E. Metzger, 08/21/2003
• ll3 on the horizon?, Jenkins, Steven, 08/19/2003
  • ll3 on the horizon?, Shriram Krishnamurthi, 08/19/2003
    • Re: ll3 on the horizon?, Chad Fowler, 08/19/2003
      • Re: ll3 on the horizon?, Shriram Krishnamurthi, 08/20/2003
• Re: forewords by Guy L. Steele Jr., Guy Steele - Sun Microsystems Labs
• Re: CPS != call/cc, Guy Steele - Sun Microsystems Labs
• RE: first-class names, Kevin S. Millikin, 08/18/2003
  • RE: first-class names, mike, 08/18/2003
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: first-class names</