[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hackers and Painters and Lawyers
On Friday, May 16, 2003, at 09:47 AM, Peter J. Wasilko, Esq. wrote:
>> Perhaps a more interesting question would be "Do the best lawyers
>> draft contracts in pairs", since I imagine that a legal document *can*
>> have subtle "bugs", which would be easier to spot with two sets of
>> eyes. I wouldn't be surprised to learn that they do.
> Greetings All,
> As an attorney I'd be happy to field this one.
> All but the richest clients would refuse to pay for two lawyers
> drafting contracts in pairs.
> What generally happens is that each firm has a collections of
> prewritten contracts and chunks of contracts that it glues together
> with "document assembly" software packages. These programs are
> mini-expert systems that ask the lawyers questions and splice in the
> right legal language based on the answers provided.
> Usually these systems start with generic commercially provided
> standared froms from legal publishers and are then customized in house
> by expert contract consel. Then Junior associates handle the first
> pass of using the programs to create a draft. The draft gets handed
> off to someone with a medium level of expertise to customize it and
> then any questionable parts get run by a real expert. The contract is
> then shown to the other side whose lawyers suggest additioanl changes
> and after a period of negotiation the final document is signed off on
> by both sides.
> Throughout, contract clauses that have already been litigated and
> interpreted by the courts are used whenever possible, since novelty of
> language equals potential ambiguity that can lead to expensive
> litigation down the road.
> All in all, legal drafting looks a lot like software reuse.
Given the spaghetti mess that is the current state of legal code, this
strikes me as a dubious analogy. Well, perhaps not in your offices :)
I was IMing with a friend the other day, remarking that it would be
nice to have more programmers in Congress - perhaps they could
mercilessly refactor the current U.S. Code.