[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CPS in Parrot
>From what I recollect, this paper was the beginning of the Mach-continuation
exploration. When it's all said and done they used the equivalent of cps
with "prompted" (delimited) continuations. I suspect that Dorai's stuff
would have been much more appropriate. -- Matthias
At Fri, 08 Aug 2003 09:36:48 +0200, Michael Sperber wrote:
> >>>>> "Anton" == Anton van Straaten <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Anton> Presumably this paper is related:
> Anton> http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/draves91using.html
> Anton> "Using Continuations to Implement Thread Management and Communication in
> Anton> Operating Systems"
> Not, though, that, from a PL perspective, this paper has the
> terminology exactly backwards. (There isn't a way I know to implement
> a general thread system *without* continuations.) This paper would be
> more aptly titled:
> "*Avoiding* Continuations in the Implementation of Thread Management and
> Communication in Operating Systems"
> When I read it originally, it took me ages to figure out why I'm just
> not getting it.
> Cheers =8-} Mike
> Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla