[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: dynamic vs. static typing

To: Michael Vanier <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: dynamic vs. static typing
From: Alexander Schmolck <address@hidden>
Date: 27 Nov 2003 00:29:30 +0000
Cc: address@hidden
In-reply-to: <200311261910.hAQJAFS31079@orchestra.cs.caltech.edu>
References: <014601c3b3b9$167e6650$0a00a8c0@femto.appsolutions.com><162501c3b400$3b2c8940$0100000a@kangaroo><200311261910.hAQJAFS31079@orchestra.cs.caltech.edu>
Sender: address@hidden
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2

Michael Vanier <mvanier@cs.caltech.edu> writes:

> This reminds me of the interface concept in java, which has proven to be
> amazingly useful in that language. Have any dynamic typing enthusiasts
> thought of adding such a feature to their languages?

Well, there is 'protocols' for python, but that has a sligthly different bend.

http://peak.telecommunity.com/protocol_ref/module-protocols.html

'as

References:
- RE: dynamic vs. static typing
  - From: "Anton van Straaten" <anton@appsolutions.com>
- Re: dynamic vs. static typing
  - From: "Peter van Rooijen" <ll1@vanrooijen.com>
- Re: dynamic vs. static typing
  - From: Michael Vanier <mvanier@cs.caltech.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: dynamic vs. static typing
Next by Date: Re: dynamic vs. static typing
Previous by thread: Re: dynamic vs. static typing
Next by thread: Re: dynamic vs. static typing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread