[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Extensible syntax

> > There's Dylan, with its template based macro system, but Dylan
> > is only extensible within a fairly strict framework. It always looks
> > like Dylan. Agree?
> Somewhat. You can't change the lexical grammar, and pairs like () {}
> must all be balanced. However, you can certainly define DSLs that look
> quite different from the standard Dylan statement macros.

Can you define new operators for use in general Dylan statements?

I don't think you can because it doesn't fit with any of the ways that
Dylan notices 'aha - this is a macro'.