Next: The cyclic case
Up: Guaranteed Rendezvous of Identical
Previous: Guaranteed Rendezvous of Identical
Based on an assignment graph
, we define a candidate Lyapunov function
as
|
(6) |
This definition of
is insensitive to edge directions in
. Unlike more conventional quadratic Lyapunov functions, this specific
takes a form linear in
, which means that the corresponding time derivative is not linear in
or
. The reason for the choice of the Lyapunov function will become clear in the next subsection. When a merge happens, we assume that the distance between the two merged agents is frozen, which is achievable by synchronizing their control. This gives us a continuous
. Alternatively, we could also let the two merged agents have zero distance, which would induce a jump in
. Since a system with
agents only has up to
merges, these discontinuities would not affect the overall rendezvous behavior of the system.
The function
defined in (6) is clearly a graph-compatible Lyapunov function. By Lemma 2, it is rendezvous positive definite if and only if
is connected. We may then study the behavior of this Lyapunov function over single-target assignment graphs to derive sufficent conditions for rendezvous of the system. For moving agents,
can be considered as a function of time; its time derivative is then
|
(7) |
Next: The cyclic case
Up: Guaranteed Rendezvous of Identical
Previous: Guaranteed Rendezvous of Identical
Jingjin Yu
2011-01-18