Re: ANN: "Interacting with CORBA" article

• To: info-dylan@ai.mit.edu
• Subject: Re: ANN: "Interacting with CORBA" article
• From: Jason Trenouth <jason@harlequin.com>
• Date: Thu, 23 Dec 1999 11:15:02 -0500 (EST)
• Cache-Post-Path: cnn!unknown@bagheera
• Organization: The Harlequin Group
• References: <ZD5iON3EBGZqLJzAMbF=r7wLCPSd@4ax.com> <83tgfq$c58$1@netserv.univ-lille1.fr>
• Xref: grapevine.lcs.mit.edu comp.lang.dylan:11347 comp.object.corba:33866

On 23 Dec 1999 15:52:26 GMT, gransart@lifl.fr (Christophe.Gransart) wrote:

> In article <ZD5iON3EBGZqLJzAMbF=r7wLCPSd@4ax.com>, Jason Trenouth <jason@harlequin.com> writes:
> 
> > why did
> > IDLScript itself need a new kind of specification process? Why isn't it simply
> > another language binding?
> 
> We followed the standard process of the OMG (RFP, initial submission, 
> revised submission).
> But the result of this standardization work was two language mappings.

I proposed the answer you are searching for is along the lines of: "I don't
know why there was a separate Scripting RFP. We just thought our stuff looked
applicable and submitted it into that process. Of course IDLScript is just
another language binding really."

__Jason

• Re: ANN: "Interacting with CORBA" article
• From: Jason Trenouth <jason@harlequin.com>
• Re: ANN: "Interacting with CORBA" article
• From: gransart@lifl.fr (Christophe.Gransart)

• Prev: Design Pattern in Dylan
• Next: Re: ANN: "Interacting with CORBA" article
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread