[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: The Lambda Nature
-
To: info-dylan@ai.mit.edu
-
Subject: Re: The Lambda Nature
-
From: Scott Ribe <sribe@miqs.com>
-
Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 12:00:03 -0400 (EDT)
-
References: <66t696q5.fsf@lambda.unlambda.com> <HmAFOfTAOnak6jtktaUBNrCWV0fD@4ax.com> <ya61799l.fsf_-_@lambda.unlambda.com> <qij3do88cbr.fsf_-_@ernie.ai.mit.edu> <Ys5O4.1295$F.37918@news4.giganews.com> <ln1yfskr.fsf@lambda.unlambda.com> <390A5F1B.4B7627CD@mastnet.net> <slrn8gkohv.8c5.cbbrowne@knuth.brownes.org> <390A6B11.2C543E14@mastnet.net> <8ee7ub$asc$1@news.huji.ac.il> <390AF3EA.3B98DCE1@mastnet.net> <ln1wds3v.fsf_-_@lambda.unlambda.com> <brucehoult-3004002016460001@bruce.bgh>
-
Xref: traf.lcs.mit.edu comp.lang.scheme:29626 comp.lang.lisp:52097 comp.lang.dylan:11933
Bruce Hoult wrote:
>
> - where are we now, ten years later?
Losing even more precious years because of the bottomless well of money
Sun uses to promote Java!
> - What is this "next LISP" of which he speaks?
Dylan, in my opion.
References: