Re: C# is not Dylan (was: Re: C# : The new language from M$)

• To: info-dylan@ai.mit.edu
• Subject: Re: C# is not Dylan (was: Re: C# : The new language from M$)
• From: Jason Trenouth <jason@harlequin.com>
• Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 10:15:02 -0400 (EDT)
• Cache-Post-Path: cnn!unknown@bagheera
• Organization: The Harlequin Group
• References: <57D01C66CBEFE28E.0140FBE2F42B8951.48F3FDB0A810D9E0@lp.airnews.net> <m3zoo7w69a.fsf@cadet.dsl.speakeasy.net> <huvjls0t6hfio3htr0r1ee3bk57b0th1dr@4ax.com> <c29g0pxbubg.fsf@nerd-xing.mit.edu> <kpamlscdjl89ihfhsdk3d4rinoa1hji78j@4ax.com> <bruce-3485B7.01374830062000@news.akl.ihug.co.nz> <m2u2ebzfyf.fsf@gododdin.internal.jasmine.org.uk> <58rolsg17q7154fdf6dq5l038rbbnl10jt@4ax.com> <3171354053463029@naggum.no>
• Xref: traf.lcs.mit.edu comp.lang.lisp:54062 comp.lang.dylan:12283

On 30 Jun 2000 11:40:53 +0000, Erik Naggum <erik@naggum.no> wrote:

> * Jason Trenouth <jason@harlequin.com>
> | No. That was ditched a long time ago.
> 
>   Yet, curiously, that was about the same time I decided Dylan was a
>   waste of time.

I appreciate that Lispers may dislike Dylan's compromises and miss some of the
omitted features. Apart from the syntax, want do you think of the semantics and
the feature set?

__Jason

• Re: C# is not Dylan (was: Re: C# : The new language from M$)
• From: Erik Naggum <erik@naggum.net>

• Re: C# is not Dylan (was: Re: C# : The new language from M$)
• From: Bruce Hoult <bruce@hoult.org>
• Re: C# is not Dylan (was: Re: C# : The new language from M$)
• From: Simon Brooke <simon@jasmine.org.uk>
• Re: C# is not Dylan (was: Re: C# : The new language from M$)
• From: Jason Trenouth <jason@harlequin.com>
• Re: C# is not Dylan (was: Re: C# : The new language from M$)
• From: Erik Naggum <erik@naggum.no>

• Prev: Re: C# is not Dylan (was: Re: C# : The new language from M$)
• Next: Re: Need help with Class-Allocated Slots
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread