[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Godwin's Law (every day in every way I'm getting meta and meta)
* Seth Gordon wrote:
> (with-pedantry
> I don't think a reference to "a white supremacist" is enough to trigger
> Godwin's Law -- you need to specifically mention, umm, you know, him, or,
> umm, you know, them.
> )
It's also OK to call them by name when discussing Godwin's law. This
is a fairly trivial consequence of Quirk's exception I think, although
I don't have my copy of `mathematical methods for usenet' to hand.
--tim
References: