[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Dylan (DYnamic LANguage) -- what's the deal?
In article <398EDB97.42126B13@dial.pipex.com>,
jt <gkt37@dial.pipex.com> wrote:
> I actually thought you were joking for a moment. But the more I think
> about it, the more horribly accurate it seems. Doesn't seem at all funny
> now.
You're absolutely right. It sounds like a joke, but I was dead serious.
Unfortunately.
> Peter da Silva wrote:
> > It has to be difficult to interoperate with, while providing the hooks
> > needed for application programs via a sufficiently complex API such that
> > programs written for it are inherently non-portable. If this makes it
> > hard to replace the first implementation with an improved one that is
> > an acceptable cost... application and environment lock-in are the only
> > critical requirements.
--
`-_-' In hoc signo hack, Peter da Silva.
'U` "Ar rug tú barróg ar do mhactíre inniu?"
Disclaimer: Matthew 10:16.
References: