Re: small Q

• To: info-dylan@ai.mit.edu
• Subject: Re: small Q
• From: Brian Campbell <Brian_Campbell@lotus.com>
• Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2000 18:15:01 -0400 (EDT)
• Organization: Lotus Development Corporation
• References: <398EA566.8AB90683@dial.pipex.com> <Gsyj5.3194$pu4.263441@typhoon.ne.mediaone.net> <8mmvgo$enu$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
• Xref: traf.lcs.mit.edu comp.lang.dylan:12570 comp.lang.scheme:30751

Since I'm comming from a long history of one return value programming
languages (Scheme R4RS, SmallTalk, C, Java, PASCAL, etc.), could someone
describe where multiple return values would be useful and not just a
convenience?

• Re: small Q
• From: "Michael T. Richter" <mtr@igs.net>
• Re: small Q
• From: peter@harlequin.com (Peter Westlake)
• Re: small Q
• From: David Rush <kumo@bellsouth.net>
• Re: small Q
• From: "Bruce G. Stewart" <bruce.g.stewart@worldnet.att.net>
• Re: small Q
• From: Bruce Hoult <bruce@hoult.org>
• Re: small Q
• From: "Alfred J. Reich" <reich@io.com>

• small Q
• From: jt <gkt37@dial.pipex.com>
• Re: small Q
• From: "Scott McKay" <swm@mediaone.net>
• Re: small Q
• From: oodl@my-deja.com

• Prev: Re: Dylan Features
• Next: Re: Dylan (DYnamic LANguage) -- what's the deal?
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread