[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Q: member syntax in dylan?
-
To: info-dylan@ai.mit.edu
-
Subject: Q: member syntax in dylan?
-
From: "Roland Paterson-Jones" <rolandpj@bigfoot.com>
-
Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 05:45:01 -0400 (EDT)
-
Organization: IBM Hursley
-
Xref: traf.lcs.mit.edu comp.lang.dylan:13278
Is there any intrinsic reason not to allow 'obj . member' syntax for methods
with more than one argument in dylan?
e.g. obj . m ( o1 , o2 , o3 , o4 )
Is there any intrinsic reason against allowing definitions of methods
closely coupled with class definition?
e.g. with <class>
define method m1 ( a1 , a2 ) ... end
end
instead of
define method m1 ( <class> this , a1 , a2 ) ... end
Please forgive all errors, I'm just starting to look at dylan for the first
time.
Roland
Follow-Ups: