Re: Are there any .NET possibilities/implications for Dylan/Functional Developer?

• To: info-dylan@ai.mit.edu
• Subject: Re: Are there any .NET possibilities/implications for Dylan/Functional Developer?
• From: shepherdofchaos@cs.com (Levi Conley)
• Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 15:00:02 -0400 (EDT)
• Organization: http://groups.google.com/
• References: <ff18f689.0106181622.1dbdc6f1@posting.google.com> <9gn0f0$u2s$1@bugstomper.ihug.com.au> <ui3uitg84ql2vce7j5a4c57pe6uuf2f6tc@4ax.com> <q_MX6.289186$eK2.58672279@news4.rdc1.on.home.com> <hmn0jt4coe1pd47pq1170754jps9kfkeph@4ax.com>
• Xref: traf.lcs.mit.edu comp.lang.dylan:13382

Jason Trenouth <jason.trenouth@globalgraphics.com> wrote in message news:<hmn0jt4coe1pd47pq1170754jps9kfkeph@4ax.com>...
> Well, I'll ask on behalf of Fun'O. All those interested in a .NET version
> of Dylan speak now.
> 
> __Jason

YEP. YEP.  UH-HUH. :)

Incidentally, is anyone out there well-versed in the Java world's
possible responses to the .net movement?  Would love to hear more
about the "other" side.  Perhaps there are better Dylan porting
options in that direction?

• Are there any .NET possibilities/implications for Dylan/Functional Developer?
• From: shepherdofchaos@cs.com (Levi Conley)
• Re: Are there any .NET possibilities/implications for Dylan/Functional Developer?
• From: "Gary Stephenson" <garys@ihug.com.au>
• Re: Are there any .NET possibilities/implications for Dylan/Functional Developer?
• From: Jason Trenouth <jason.trenouth@globalgraphics.com>
• Re: Are there any .NET possibilities/implications for Dylan/Functional Developer?
• From: "Michael T. Richter" <mtr@ottawa.com>
• Re: Are there any .NET possibilities/implications for Dylan/Functional Developer?
• From: Jason Trenouth <jason.trenouth@globalgraphics.com>

• Prev: Re: Newbie surveying the multitudes of Programming Langs...
• Next: Re: Are there any .NET possibilities/implications for Dylan/Functional Developer?
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread