Re: Functional Developer UNICODE support + source?

• To: info-dylan@ai.mit.edu
• Subject: Re: Functional Developer UNICODE support + source?
• From: nospam@nospam.com (Gail Zacharias)
• Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 19:30:01 -0400 (EDT)
• References: <9jhrhh$471$1@plutonium.btinternet.com> <s5cqlt8m9acjkpqb3na979g20vdgami68j@4ax.com> <9jkcer$bl8$1@plutonium.btinternet.com>
• Xref: traf.lcs.mit.edu comp.lang.dylan:13503

On Tue, 24 Jul 2001 18:48:51 -0700, "Mark Jordan"
<Mark_Jordan@nospam.btinternet.com> wrote:
>I'd ask for the rules, but the complex job of writing Dylan CFFI's and
>no unicode has put me off using Dylan at all. What I really need is
>a CPPFFI to interface to existing C++ class libraries.  Any ideas on
>how this might be done?

We're definitely aware that the lack of unicode is a big hole that's
high priority to fix.  As is C++ support -- the recommended approach
is to use COM.  It's not ideal, but direct C++ interoperability is
really an impossible problem for any language that's not C.

Gail Zacharias
gz -at- functionalobjects.com

• Re: Functional Developer UNICODE support + source?
• From: "Mark Jordan" <Mark_Jordan@nospam.btinternet.com>
• Re: Functional Developer UNICODE support + source?
• From: Jason Trenouth <jason.trenouth@globalgraphics.com>

• Functional Developer UNICODE support + source?
• From: "Mark Jordan" <Mark_Jordan@nospam.btinternet.com>
• Re: Functional Developer UNICODE support + source?
• From: Jason Trenouth <jason.trenouth@globalgraphics.com>
• Re: Functional Developer UNICODE support + source?
• From: "Mark Jordan" <Mark_Jordan@nospam.btinternet.com>

• Prev: Re: Multiple dispatch / multimethods??
• Next: Re: Multiple dispatch / multimethods??
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread