[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Simpe Gwydion question
"Bruce Hoult" <bruce@hoult.org> wrote in message
bruce-9A2922.09503916072002@copper.ipg.tsnz.net">news:bruce-9A2922.09503916072002@copper.ipg.tsnz.net...
> In article <457e22d8.0207150346.4b3912cc@posting.google.com>,
> fn@hungry.com (Faried Nawaz) wrote:
>
> > Lame followup:
> >
> > -- cmucl --
> > 44.7476 seconds of user run time
> > -- dylan --
> > 30.21 real 27.60 user 0.02 sys
> > -- c --
> > 30.20 real 27.59 user 0.03 sys
>
> So Dylan is 60% faster than CMUCL, and within experiemental error of C.
>
> Notes:
>
> - this is a slightly different task than the previous example used
>
> - the Dylan program is running with full safety e.g. bounds checks, type
> checks. Both the C and Common Lisp programs are unsafe.
This is a great result. Publish it somewhere. (Really)