Re: Macro hell

[Carl Gay <address@hidden>]

At 09:35 AM 9/18/2002 +0100, Rob Myers wrote:
>On Wednesday, September 18, 2002, at 04:30 AM, Carl Gay wrote:
>
>>Is that basic approach reasonable?
>
>Yes.
>
>>Better way?
>
>Seperate out the slot definers into their own macros?
>
>My gut feeling is that the ..., and the , * => * are interacting somehow, but I don't see why when they work above (they *do* work above, don't they? They're not failing to match or anything?).
>
>- Rob.

As posted, the "slot foo;" should fail to parse correctly, but if that's removed
it should work ok.