[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What is a lightweight language
Bruce Lewis wrote:
> The important context is programming (as opposed to text markup).
There are very few users of XML that try to make it into a programming
language. Even XSLT was not intended to be anything like a general
purpose programming language.
> For programming, s-exprs provide much better readability. Not even the
> XSLT folks advocate using XML syntax to structure all programmatic
No, but I think you'd have a heard time getting them to advocate using
all s-expressions either. ;)
> I'm not actually thinking about motivating people to switch programming
> languages. What I'm doing is providing ambitious web developers an
> attractive option for getting into server-side web programming. The
> syntax feels similar to XML, yet is dissimilar enough to avoid confusion
> in a template system.
So the most apt comparison is not really with XML (even XSLT) but more
with PHP or ASP.